Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24788320›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2014

Antibiotic treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Mark Pimentel, Christopher Chang, Kathleen Shari Chua, James Mirocha, John DiBaise, Satish Rao, Meridythe Amichai

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04501380 (A Randomized Open Label Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of AEMCOLO), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04501380 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Open Label Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of AEMCOLO (Rifamycin SV MMX) in the Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBradley ConnorRan2020 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, Gastrointestinal Disease, Gastrointestinal InfectionArmsAEMCOLO (Rifamycin SV MMX)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark PimentelGI Motility Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA, pimentelm@cshs.org.
Christopher Chang
Kathleen Shari Chua
James Mirocha
John DiBaise
Satish Rao
Meridythe Amichai
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USAugusta University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe antibiotic rifaximin is used to treat non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methane production is associated with constipation and its severity in constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS). A previous retrospective study suggested that rifaximin and neomycin was superior to neomycin alone in improving symptoms in methane-positive subjects.

aimsTo determine the effectiveness of neomycin alone or with rifaximin in improving symptoms in methane-positive C-IBS subjects.

methodsA double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed from 2010 to 2013 at three tertiary care centers. Subjects aged 18-65 with C-IBS (Rome II criteria) and breath methane (>3 ppm) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. Subjects completed a baseline symptom questionnaire rating the severity of abdominal and bowel symptoms on a visual analog scale and were randomized to receive neomycin and placebo or neomycin and rifaximin for 14 days. Symptom severity was assessed by weekly questionnaire for 2 weeks of therapy and 4 additional weeks of follow-up.

resultsThirty-one subjects (16 neomycin and placebo, 15 neomycin and rifaximin) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Constipation severity was significantly lower in the neomycin and rifaximin group (28.6 ± 30.8) compared to neomycin alone (61.2 ± 24.1) (P = 0.0042), with greater improvement in constipation (P = 0.007), straining (P = 0.017) and bloating (P = 0.020), but not abdominal pain. In the neomycin and rifaximin group, subjects with methane <3 ppm after treatment reported significantly lower constipation severity (30.5 ± 21.8) than subjects with persistent methane (67.2 ± 32.1) (P = 0.020).

conclusionsRifaximin plus neomycin is superior to neomycin alone in improving multiple C-IBS symptoms. This effect is predicted by a reduction in breath methane.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Infective AgentsBreath TestsConstipationFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMethaneMiddle AgedNeomycinRifamycinsRifaximinAnti-Infective AgentsGastrointestinal AgentsMethaneNeomycinRifamycinsRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID24788320
OpenAlexW2094665977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.