Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24787688›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

A prospective cohort study of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy: the first 147 pregnancies and 100 one year old babies.

Jayashri Kulkarni, Roisin Worsley, Heather Gilbert, Emorfia Gavrilidis, Tamsyn E Van Rheenen, Wei Wang, Kay McCauley, Paul Fitzgerald

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Use of Antipsychotic Drugs During Pregnancy.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jayashri KulkarniMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roisin WorsleyMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Heather GilbertMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emorfia GavrilidisMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tamsyn E Van RheenenMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wei WangMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kay McCauleySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Australia.
Paul FitzgeraldMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University & Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women diagnosed with varying psychiatric disorders take antipsychotic medications during pregnancy. The safety of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy is largely unknown.

methodsWe established the National Register of Antipsychotic Medications in Pregnancy in 2005. Women who are pregnant and taking an antipsychotic medication are interviewed every 6 weeks during pregnancy and then followed until their babies are one year old. The baby's progress is closely followed for the first year of life.

findingsAs of April 18 2012, 147 pregnancies had been followed through to completion. There were 142 live births and data is available for 100 one year old babies. 18% of babies were born preterm, with a higher dose of antipsychotic medication correlating to an increased likelihood of premature delivery; 43% of babies required special care nursery or intensive care after birth; 37% had any degree of respiratory distress and 15% of babies developed withdrawal symptoms. Congenital anomalies were seen in eight babies. Most pregnancies resulted in the birth of live, healthy babies. The use of mood stabilisers or higher doses of antipsychotics during pregnancy increased the likelihood of babies experiencing respiratory distress or admission to Special Care Nursery or Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

conclusionThere is a great need for safety and efficacy information about the use of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy. Live, healthy babies are the most common outcome following the use of antipsychotic medication in pregnancy, but clinicians should be particularly mindful of neonatal problems such as respiratory distress.

Indexed as

AdultAntipsychotic AgentsCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfantMaleMental DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesRegistriesSafetyAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24787688
PMCPMC4008497
OpenAlexW2042123542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.