Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24787291›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology2014

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer: therapeutic, predictive, and prognostic implications.

C Marcela Diaz-Montero, Jim Finke, Alberto J Montero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 3D bioprinting innovations: a new frontier in breast cancer research.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Immune Checkpoints in Endometriosis-A New Insight in the Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Immunotherapeutic Strategies in the Management of Osteosarcoma.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multi-Omics Profiling of the Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Marcela Diaz-MonteroLerner Research Institute Department of Immunology; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Jim FinkeLerner Research Institute Department of Immunology; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Alberto J MonteroTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: montero2@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Enhancing T-Cell Responses with the Glutathione Mimetic NOV-002 in Breast CancerK23CA148893 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MONTERO, ALBERTO JOSE · 2010 to 2014
$798k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA148893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune evasion is a hallmark of cancer. While there are multiple different mechanisms that cancer cells employ, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are one of the key drivers of tumor-mediated immune evasion. MDSCs begin as myeloid cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment, where they are transformed into potent immunosuppressive cells. However, our understanding of the clinical relevance of MDSCs in cancer patients has significantly lagged behind the preclinical literature in part due to the absence of a cognate molecule present in mice, as well as to the considerable heterogeneity of MDSCs. However, if one evaluates the clinical literature through the filter of clinically robust endpoints, such as overall survival, three important phenotypes emerge: promyelocytic, monocytic, and granulocytic. Based on these studies, MDSCs have clear prognostic importance in multiple solid tumors, and emerging data support the utility of circulating MDSCs as a predictive marker for cancer immunotherapy, and even as an early leading marker for predicting clinical response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. More recent preclinical data in immunosuppressed murine models suggest that MDSCs play an important role in tumor progression and the metastatic process that is independent of their immunosuppressive properties. Consequently, targeting MDSCs either in combination with cancer immunotherapy or independently as part of an approach to inhibit the metastatic process appears to be a very clinically promising strategy. We review different approaches to target MDSCs that could potentially be tested in future clinical trials in cancer patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsDisease ProgressionGranulocytesHumansImmune SystemImmunosuppression TherapyImmunotherapyMiceMonocytesMyeloid CellsNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsPhenotypePrognosisStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID24787291
PMCPMC4008844
OpenAlexW2079361633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.