Update in environmental and occupational lung diseases 2013.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. New insights into the function and mechanisms of piRNA PMLCPIR in promoting PMJournal of advanced research · 2025
   Article
2. Chronic Effects of High Fine Particulate Matter Exposure on Lung Cancer in China.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
   Article
3. Systematic Screening for Occupational Exposures in Lung Cancer Patients: A Prospective French Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
   Article
4. Allelic Spectra of Risk SNPs Are Different for Environment/Lifestyle Dependent versus Independent Diseases.PLoS genetics · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as