Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24786589›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2014

Regulation of transcription by 6S RNAs: insights from the Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis model systems.

Benedikt Steuten, Philipp G Hoch, Katrin Damm, Sabine Schneider, Karen Köhler, Rolf Wagner, Roland K Hartmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of Stationary Phase Small ncRNAs inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Gene Regulation and Transcriptomics.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt SteutenHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf; Institut für Physikalische Biologie Universitätsstr; Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipp G HochPhilipps-Universität Marburg; Marburg, Germany.
Katrin DammPhilipps-Universität Marburg; Marburg, Germany.
Sabine SchneiderHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf; Institut für Physikalische Biologie Universitätsstr; Düsseldorf, Germany.
Karen KöhlerPhilipps-Universität Marburg; Marburg, Germany.
Rolf WagnerHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf; Institut für Physikalische Biologie Universitätsstr; Düsseldorf, Germany.
Roland K HartmannPhilipps-Universität Marburg; Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas, the majority of bacterial non-coding RNAs and functional RNA elements regulate post-transcriptional processes, either by interacting with other RNAs via base-pairing or through binding of small ligands (riboswitches), 6S RNAs affect transcription itself by binding to the housekeeping holoenzyme of RNA polymerase (RNAP). Remarkably, 6S RNAs serve as RNA templates for bacterial RNAP, giving rise to the de novo synthesis of short transcripts, termed pRNAs (product RNAs). Hence, 6S RNAs prompt the enzyme to act as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). Synthesis of pRNAs exceeding a certain length limit (~13 nt) persistently rearrange the 6S RNA structure, which in turn, disrupts the 6S RNA:RNAP complex. This pRNA synthesis-mediated "reanimation" of sequestered RNAP molecules represents the conceivably fastest mechanism for resuming transcription in cells that enter a new exponential growth phase. The many different 6S RNAs found in a wide variety of bacteria do not share strong sequence homology but have in common a conserved rod-shaped structure with a large internal loop, termed the central bulge; this architecture mediates specific binding to the active site of RNAP. In this article, we summarize the overall state of knowledge as well as very recent findings on the structure, function, and physiological effects of 6S RNA examples from the two model organisms, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Comparison of the presently known properties of 6S RNAs in the two organisms highlights common principles as well as diverse features.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialTranscription, GeneticBacillus subtilisDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingRNA, BacterialRNA, UntranslatedTemplates, Genetic6S RNADNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNA, BacterialRNA, Untranslated6S RNAsfunctionmechanismphysiological rolestructuretranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID24786589
PMCPMC4152359
OpenAlexW2047849845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.