Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24786538›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Trends in the epidemiology of pandemic and non-pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India.

Gururaja P Pazhani, Sushanta K Bhowmik, Santanu Ghosh, Sucharita Guin, Sanjucta Dutta, Krishnan Rajendran, Dhira Rani Saha, Ranjan K Nandy, Mihir K Bhattacharya, Asish K Mukhopadhyay and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterization ofSAGE open medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and Antibiogram ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Isolation and Characterization of SixFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PathogenicHeliyon · 2019
    Article
  17. Clustering ofFrontiers in public health · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gururaja P PazhaniNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Sushanta K BhowmikNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Santanu GhoshNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Sucharita GuinNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Sanjucta DuttaNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Krishnan RajendranNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Dhira Rani SahaNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Ranjan K NandyNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Mihir K BhattacharyaNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Asish K MukhopadhyayNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Thandavarayan RamamurthyNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 178 strains of V. parahaemolyticus isolated from 13,607 acute diarrheal patients admitted in the Infectious Diseases Hospital, Kolkata has been examined for serovar prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic traits with reference to virulence, and clonal lineages. Clinical symptoms and stool characteristics of V. parahaemolyticus infected patients were analyzed for their specific traits. The frequency of pandemic strains was 68%, as confirmed by group-specific PCR (GS-PCR). However, the prevalence of non-pandemic strains was comparatively low (32%). Serovars O3:K6 (19.7%), O1:K25 (18.5%), O1:KUT (11.2%) were more commonly found and other serovars such as O3:KUT (6.7%), O4:K8 (6.7%), and O2:K3 (4.5%) were newly detected in this region. The virulence gene tdh was most frequently detected in GS-PCR positive strains. There was no association between strain features and stool characteristics or clinical outcomes with reference to serovar, pandemic/non-pandemic or virulence profiles. Ampicillin and streptomycin resistance was constant throughout the study period and the MIC of ampicillin among selected strains ranged from 24 to >256 µg/ml. Susceptibility of these strains to ampicillin increased several fold in the presence of carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenyldrazone. The newly reported ESBL encoding gene from VPA0477 was found in all the strains, including the susceptible ones for ampicillin. However, none of the strains exhibited the β-lactamase as a phenotypic marker. In the analysis of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the pandemic strains formed two different clades, with one containing the newly emerged pandemic strains in this region.

Indexed as

PandemicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiarrheaDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesHumansIndiaLinear ModelsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSerotypingVibrio InfectionsVibrio parahaemolyticusAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24786538
PMCPMC4006737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.