Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2478652›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine1989

Myelopoietic enhancing effects of murine macrophage inflammatory proteins 1 and 2 on colony formation in vitro by murine and human bone marrow granulocyte/macrophage progenitor cells.

H E Broxmeyer, B Sherry, L Lu, S Cooper, C Carow, S D Wolpe, A Cerami

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Innate signaling in otitis media: pathogenesis and recovery.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2011
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Regulation of hematopoiesis by chemokine family members.International journal of hematology · 2001
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Molecular cloning and structure of a pre-B-cell growth-stimulating factor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H E BroxmeyerDepartment of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46223.
B Sherry
L Lu
S Cooper
C Carow
S D Wolpe
A Cerami
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

PARASITE-INDUCED CATABOLISM IN MAMMALSR01AI021359 · NIAID · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CERAMI, ANTHONY · 1985 to 1998
–
MYELOPOIETIC REGULATION BY LACTOFERRIN AND TRANSFERRINR01CA036464 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 1985 to 1986
–
REGULATION OF MYELOPOIESIS: SUPPRESSOR FACTOR SYNERGISMR01CA036740 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 1985 to 1990
–
CSF MGF FUSION PROTEINS AND MYELOPOIESISR37CA036464 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 1987 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-36464NCI NIH HHS CA-36740NIAID NIH HHS AI-21359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two recently identified and purified murine macrophage inflammatory proteins MIP-1 and MIP-2 were tested in vitro both alone, and in combination with purified recombinant (r) murine (mu) GM-CSF, natural (n)muCSF-1, or rhuman (hu)G-CSF, for effects on mouse marrow CFU-GM, in combination with erythropoietin for effects on mouse marrow BFU-E, and in combination with rhuGM-CSF or rhuG-CSF for effects on human marrow CFU-GM. MIP-1 and MIP-2 did not stimulate, but did enhance by up to threefold, colony formation of mouse CFU-GM co-stimulated by rmuGM-CSF and nmuCSF-1, but not by rhuG-CSF, in the absence or presence of serum. MIP-1 and MIP-2 were maximally active at concentrations greater than or equal to 100 ng/ml and the actions appeared to be initiated during the DNA synthetic portion of the cell cycle. Neither MIP-1 nor MIP-2 at up to 1 microgram/ml had any effect on mouse BFU-E, in the absence or presence of erythropoietin. Both MIP-1 and MIP-2 had direct acting effects on purified mouse CFU-GM. The cloning efficiency of 200 purified cells plated with 50 U muCSF-1 was 82% with and 43% without MIP; the cloning efficiency with 50 U rmuGM-CSF was 65% with and 35% without MIP. MIP effects were not mimicked by bacterial LPS, rhuIL-1 alpha, rhuIL-6, or rmuIL-4, and were neutralized by their respective specific antibodies. MIP-1 and MIP-2 also enhanced endogenously stimulated and rhuGM-CSF-, but not rhuG-CSF-, stimulated colony formation by human marrow CFU-GM. These results demonstrate a new role for MIP-1 and MIP-2 in vitro as myelopoietic enhancing activities for CFU-GM.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell CycleCells, CulturedChemotactic FactorsColony-Stimulating FactorsDrug SynergismGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorGrowth SubstancesHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHeparinHumansInterleukin-8In Vitro TechniquesChemotactic FactorsColony-Stimulating FactorsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorGrowth SubstancesHeparinInterleukin-8Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID2478652
PMCPMC2189508
OpenAlexW2148687063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.