Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24786227›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2015

The relationship between biogenetic attributions and desire for social distance from persons with schizophrenia and major depression revisited.

M C Angermeyer, A Daubmann, K Wegscheider, E Mnich, G Schomerus, O V D Knesebeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Changes in Attitudes toward Mental Illness in Healthcare Professionals and Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Renaming schizophrenia: benefits, challenges and barriers.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M C AngermeyerCenter for Public Mental Health,Gösing am Wagram,Austria.
A DaubmannDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Hamburg,Germany.
K WegscheiderDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Hamburg,Germany.
E MnichDepartment of Medical Sociology,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Hamburg,Germany.
G SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry,University Medicine Greifswald,Greifswald,Germany.
O V D KnesebeckDepartment of Medical Sociology,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Hamburg,Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPrevious population-based studies did not support the view that biological and genetic causal models help increase social acceptance of people with mental illness. However, practically all these studies used un-labelled vignettes depicting symptoms of the disorders of interest. Thus, in these studies the public's reactions to pathological behaviour had been assessed rather than reactions to psychiatric disorders that had explicitly been labelled as such. The question arises as to whether results would have been similar if respondents had been confronted with vignettes with explicit mention of the respective diagnosis.

methodsAnalyses are based on data of a telephone survey in two German metropolises conducted in 2011. Case-vignettes with typical symptoms suggestive of depression or schizophrenia were presented to the respondents. After presentation of the vignette respondents were informed about the diagnosis.

resultsWe found a statistically significant association of the endorsement of brain disease as a cause with greater desire for social distance from persons with schizophrenia. In major depression, this relation was absent. With both disorders, there was no statistically significant association between the endorsement of hereditary factors as a cause and social distance.

conclusionsIrrespective of whether unlabelled or labelled vignettes are employed, the ascription to biological or genetic causes seems not to be associated with a reduction of the public's desire for social distance from people with schizophrenia or depression. Our results corroborate the notion that promulgating biological and genetic causal models may not help decrease the stigma surrounding these illnesses.

Indexed as

Causal attributionsmajor depressionschizophreniasocial distance

Identifiers

PMID24786227
PMCPMC7192186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.