Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24786139›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2014

Community-based prenatal screening for postpartum depression in a South African township.

Kristin J Hung, Mark Tomlinson, Ingrid M le Roux, Sarah Dewing, Mickey Chopra, Alexander C Tsai

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin J HungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA. Electronic address: khung@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Mark TomlinsonDepartment of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Ingrid M le RouxPhilani Maternal Child Health and Nutrition Project, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sarah DewingHealth Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Mickey ChopraHealth Section, United Nations Children's Fund, NY, USA.
Alexander C TsaiCenter for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Chester M. Pierce, MD Division of Global Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

TRAINING THE NEXT GENERATION OF MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCHERSR25MH060482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DANIEL H MATHALON, Susan M. Voglmaier · 2000 to 2026
$5.2M
Microenterprise to empower and improve health of HIV+ women in UgandaK23MH096620 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TSAI, ALEXANDER C · 2012 to 2016
$922k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH096620NIMH NIH HHS K23MH096620NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH060482NIMH NIH HHS R25MH060482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of using community health workers to administer short or ultra-short screening instruments during routine community-based prenatal outreach for detecting probable depression at 12 weeks postpartum.

methodsDuring pregnancy and at 12 weeks postpartum, the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS-10) was administered to 249 Xhosa-speaking black African women living in Khayelitsha, South Africa. We compared the operating characteristics of the prenatal EPDS-10, as well as 4 short and ultra-short subscales, with the criterion standard of probable postpartum depression.

resultsSeventy-nine (31.7%) women were assessed as having probable postpartum depression. A prenatal EPDS-10 score of 13 or higher had 0.67 sensitivity and 0.67 specificity for detecting probable postpartum depression. Briefer subscales performed similarly.

conclusionCommunity health workers successfully conducted community-based screening for depression in a resource-limited setting using short or ultra-short screening instruments. However, overall feasibility was limited because prenatal screening failed to accurately predict probable depression during the postpartum period.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersMass ScreeningPrenatal CareAdultDepression, PostpartumFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSouth AfricaYoung AdultPostpartum depressionScreeningSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID24786139
PMCPMC4053501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.