Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24785991›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Copy number variation is a fundamental aspect of the placental genome.

Roberta L Hannibal, Edward B Chuong, Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia, David M Gilbert, Anton Valouev, Julie C Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roberta L HannibalDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Edward B ChuongDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Juan Carlos Rivera-MuliaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Tallahassee Florida, United States of America.
David M GilbertDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Tallahassee Florida, United States of America.
Anton ValouevDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Julie C BakerDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stanford University · USFlorida State University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of lineage-specific somatic copy number variation (CNV) in mammals has led to debate over whether CNVs are mutations that propagate disease or whether they are a normal, and even essential, aspect of cell biology. We show that 1,000 N polyploid trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) of the mouse placenta contain 47 regions, totaling 138 Megabases, where genomic copies are underrepresented (UR). UR domains originate from a subset of late-replicating heterochromatic regions containing gene deserts and genes involved in cell adhesion and neurogenesis. While lineage-specific CNVs have been identified in mammalian cells, classically in the immune system where V(D)J recombination occurs, we demonstrate that CNVs form during gestation in the placenta by an underreplication mechanism, not by recombination nor deletion. Our results reveal that large scale CNVs are a normal feature of the mammalian placental genome, which are regulated systematically during embryogenesis and are propagated by a mechanism of underreplication.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenomeAnimalsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationFemaleGene DeletionHumansNeurogenesisPlacentaPolyploidyPregnancyStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID24785991
PMCPMC4006706
OpenAlexW2119626690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.