Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24785686›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

The spatiotemporal program of DNA replication is associated with specific combinations of chromatin marks in human cells.

Franck Picard, Jean-Charles Cadoret, Benjamin Audit, Alain Arneodo, Adriana Alberti, Christophe Battail, Laurent Duret, Marie-Noelle Prioleau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Franck PicardLaboratoire Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558 Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Jean-Charles CadoretInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, University Paris 7, Équipe Labellisé Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
Benjamin AuditUniversité de Lyon, Laboratoire de Physique, UMR CNRS 5672 ENS Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alain ArneodoUniversité de Lyon, Laboratoire de Physique, UMR CNRS 5672 ENS Lyon, Lyon, France.
Adriana AlbertiGénoscope-CEA Sequencing Center, Evry, France.
Christophe BattailGénoscope-CEA Sequencing Center, Evry, France.
Laurent DuretLaboratoire Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558 Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Marie-Noelle PrioleauInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, University Paris 7, Équipe Labellisé Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The duplication of mammalian genomes is under the control of a spatiotemporal program that orchestrates the positioning and the timing of firing of replication origins. The molecular mechanisms coordinating the activation of about [Formula: see text] predicted origins remain poorly understood, partly due to the intrinsic rarity of replication bubbles, making it difficult to purify short nascent strands (SNS). The precise identification of origins based on the high-throughput sequencing of SNS constitutes a new methodological challenge. We propose a new statistical method with a controlled resolution, adapted to the detection of replication origins from SNS data. We detected an average of 80,000 replication origins in different cell lines. To evaluate the consistency between different protocols, we compared SNS detections with bubble trapping detections. This comparison demonstrated a good agreement between genome-wide methods, with 65% of SNS-detected origins validated by bubble trapping, and 44% of bubble trapping origins validated by SNS origins, when compared at the same resolution. We investigated the interplay between the spatial and the temporal programs of replication at fine scales. We show that most of the origins detected in regions replicated in early S phase are shared by all the cell lines investigated whereas cell-type-specific origins tend to be replicated in late S phase. We shed a new light on the key role of CpG islands, by showing that 80% of the origins associated with CGIs are constitutive. Our results further show that at least 76% of CGIs are origins of replication. The analysis of associations with chromatin marks at different timing of cell division revealed new potential epigenetic regulators driving the spatiotemporal activity of replication origins. We highlight the potential role of H4K20me1 and H3K27me3, the coupling of which is correlated with increased efficiency of replication origins, clearly identifying those marks as potential key regulators of replication origins.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationCell LineChromatinHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID24785686
PMCPMC4006723
OpenAlexW2036824884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.