Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24785612›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2014

Early-onset group B streptococcal disease in the United States: potential for further reduction.

Jennifer R Verani, Nancy L Spina, Ruth Lynfield, William Schaffner, Lee H Harrison, Amy Holst, Stepy Thomas, Jessica M Garcia, Karen Scherzinger, Deborah Aragon and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Racial disparities in intrapartum group B Streptococcus colonization: a higher incidence of conversion in African American women.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jennifer R VeraniCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, the Georgia Emerging Infections Program/Atlanta VA Medical Center, and the Georgia Department of Community Health, Atlanta, Georgia; the Emerging Infections Program, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York; the Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado; the Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut; the Oregon Public Health Division, Portland, Oregon; and the California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California.
Nancy L Spina
Ruth Lynfield
William Schaffner
Lee H Harrison
Amy Holst
Stepy Thomas
Jessica M Garcia
Karen Scherzinger
Deborah Aragon
Susan Petit
Jamie Thompson
Lauren Pasutti
Roberta Carey
Lesley McGee
Emily Weston
Stephanie J Schrag

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe lapses in adherence to group B streptococcus (GBS) prevention guidelines among cases of early-onset GBS disease in term and preterm neonates and to estimate the potential for further reduction in disease burden under current prevention strategies.

methodsWe reviewed labor and delivery and prenatal records of mothers of neonates with early-onset GBS disease (aged younger than 7 days with GBS isolated from a normally sterile site) identified at population-based surveillance sites in 2008-2009. We interviewed prenatal care providers about GBS screening practices and obtained relevant laboratory records. We evaluated the data for errors in prenatal screening, laboratory methods, communication of results, and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Using published data on screening sensitivity and intrapartum prophylaxis effectiveness, we estimated the potential reduction in cases under optimal prevention implementation.

resultsAmong 309 cases, 179 (57.9%) had one or more implementation errors. The most common error type in term and preterm case-patients was prenatal screening (80 of 222 [36.0%]) and intrapartum prophylaxis (46 of 85 [54.1%]), respectively. We estimated that under optimal implementation, cases of early-onset GBS disease could be reduced by 26-59% with the largest benefit from a single intervention coming from improved use of intrapartum prophylaxis (16% decrease).

conclusionFurther reduction of early-onset GBS disease burden is possible under current prevention strategies, particularly with improved implementation of antibiotic prophylaxis. However, even with perfect adherence to recommended practices, the decline in cases may be modest. Therefore, novel prevention approaches such as improved intrapartum assays and vaccines are also needed.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetStreptococcus agalactiaeAntibiotic ProphylaxisFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesStreptococcal Infections

Identifiers

PMID24785612
PMCPMC11863723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.