Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24785494›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Failure to learn a new spatial format in children with developmental dyslexia.

Maria Pontillo, Maria De Luca, Andrew W Ellis, Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Donatella Spinelli, Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Pontillo1] Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy [2] Psychology Department, Sapienza University of Rome, via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Maria De LucaNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Andrew W EllisDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Chiara Valeria MarinelliNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Donatella Spinelli1] Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy [2] Department of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", piazza Lauro De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, Italy.
Pierluigi Zoccolotti1] Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy [2] Psychology Department, Sapienza University of Rome, via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A general problem in studying children with developmental dyslexia is how to separate inefficiency in learning on the one hand from exposure to written texts on the other. To evaluate dyslexic children's learning abilities with graphemic materials, we tested their improvement in a condition that minimized previous experience with words (i.e., "novel words") and with the standard, horizontal spatial letter array (i.e., a non-canonical "zigzag" format). We selected five pairs of children with dyslexia and (younger) typically developing readers matched for reading speed and accuracy in these specific conditions. Reading performance on novel words in the zigzag format was measured in 23 sessions; learning curves were fitted by power functions. Similar to typically developing readers, children with dyslexia improved their reading of novel words presented in the new format; however, their rate of learning was slower than that of typically developing readers. Furthermore, their learning to read in the new format did not generalize to novel untrained items, whereas significant generalization was present in typically developing readers. As the failure to generalize learning of the spatial format could not be attributed to reduced experience, it indicates a genuine disability and points to impaired perceptual learning as a factor in developmental dyslexia.

Indexed as

LearningAdolescentChildDyslexiaFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeReading

Identifiers

PMID24785494
PMCPMC4007079
OpenAlexW2016567781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.