ReviewRNA biology2014
Computational modeling of RNA 3D structures, with the aid of experimental restraints.
Review in RNA biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico designing of small molecules for targeting RNA: current landscape and future directions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Computational tools to study RNA-protein complexes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Advances in RNA 3D Structure Modeling Using Experimental Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Computational modeling of RNA 3D structure based on experimental data.Bioscience reports · 2019Review
- High-throughput determination of RNA structures.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- Predicting 3D structure and stability of RNA pseudoknots in monovalent and divalent ion solutions.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Hierarchical Assembly of RNA Three-Dimensional Structures Based on Loop Templates.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018Article
- Modelling the three-dimensional structure of the right-terminal domain of pospiviroids.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Single-molecule FRET-Rosetta reveals RNA structural rearrangements during human telomerase catalysis.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Direct identification of base-paired RNA nucleotides by correlated chemical probing.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Using RNA Sequence and Structure for the Prediction of Riboswitch Aptamer: A Comprehensive Review of Available Software and Tools.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Review
- Article
- SimRNA: a coarse-grained method for RNA folding simulations and 3D structure prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Progress and Current Challenges in Modeling Large RNAs.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Review
- On the Applicability of Elastic Network Models for the Study of RNA CUG Trinucleotide Repeat Overexpansion.PloS one · 2016Article
- Direct-Coupling Analysis of nucleotide coevolution facilitates RNA secondary and tertiary structure prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to mRNAs whose primary function is transmission of genetic information from DNA to proteins, numerous other classes of RNA molecules exist, which are involved in a variety of functions, such as catalyzing biochemical reactions or performing regulatory roles. In analogy to proteins, the function of RNAs depends on their structure and dynamics, which are largely determined by the ribonucleotide sequence. Experimental determination of high-resolution RNA structures is both laborious and difficult, and therefore, the majority of known RNAs remain structurally uncharacterized. To address this problem, computational structure prediction methods were developed that simulate either the physical process of RNA structure formation ("Greek science" approach) or utilize information derived from known structures of other RNA molecules ("Babylonian science" approach). All computational methods suffer from various limitations that make them generally unreliable for structure prediction of long RNA sequences. However, in many cases, the limitations of computational and experimental methods can be overcome by combining these two complementary approaches with each other. In this work, we review computational approaches for RNA structure prediction, with emphasis on implementations (particular programs) that can utilize restraints derived from experimental analyses. We also list experimental approaches, whose results can be relatively easily used by computational methods. Finally, we describe case studies where computational and experimental analyses were successfully combined to determine RNA structures that would remain out of reach for each of these approaches applied separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.