Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24784719›Full record

Trial reportReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2014

Effect of a low-dose contraceptive patch on efficacy, bleeding pattern, and safety: a 1-year, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study.

Inka Wiegratz, Susana Bassol, Edith Weisberg, Uwe Mellinger, Martin Merz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pipeline for contraceptive development.Fertility and sterility · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Inka WiegratzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MVZ Kinderwunschzentrum Wiesbaden GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany Faculty of Medicine of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Susana BassolDepartment of Reproductive Biology, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Coahuila, Coahuila, Mexico.
Edith WeisbergSydney Centre for Reproductive Health Research, FPNSW and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Uwe MellingerWomen's Health, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Martin MerzWomen's Health, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany martin.merz@bayer.com.
Bayer (Germany) · DEUniversidad Autónoma de Coahuila · MXUniversity of Sydney · AUZentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Phase III, uncontrolled, open-label, multicenter study was conducted to investigate the contraceptive efficacy, bleeding pattern, and cycle control of a novel once-a-week contraceptive patch, delivering low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) and gestodene (GSD) at the same systemic exposure seen after oral administration of a combined oral contraceptive containing 0.02 mg EE/0.06 mg GSD. Participants were women aged 18 to 35 years, all of whom received the EE/GSD patch for 13 cycles each of 21 treatment days (one patch per week for 3 weeks) followed by a 7-day, patch-free interval. The primary efficacy variable was the occurrence of unintended pregnancies during the study period as assessed by life table analysis and the Pearl Index. Secondary efficacy variables were days with bleeding during four 90-day reference periods and during 1 treatment year, bleeding pattern, and cycle control. The Kaplan-Meier probability of contraceptive protection after 364 treatment days was 98.8% and the adjusted Pearl Index was 0.81. The percentage of participants with intracyclic bleeding/spotting decreased over time, from 11.4% to 6.8% in cycles 1 and 12, respectively. Almost all participants (range: 90.8%-97.6%) experienced withdrawal bleeding across the study period. Compliance was very high (mean: 97.9%; median: 100%). The most frequent adverse events were headache (9.5%) and application site reaction (8.5%); no clinically significant safety concerns were observed. Results suggest the EE/GSD patch is highly effective in preventing pregnancy. Menstrual bleeding pattern was favorable and within the ranges expected of a healthy female population. The patch was well tolerated and treatment compliance was high.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAustraliaChileContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, Oral, CombinedDrug Administration ScheduleEthinyl EstradiolEuropeFemaleHumansMedication AdherenceMenstruationMexicoContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, Oral, CombinedEthinyl EstradiolGestodeneNorpregnenesethinyl estradiolfemale contraceptiongestodenepearl indextransdermal

Identifiers

PMID24784719
PMCPMC4231129
OpenAlexW1993213549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.