Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24784581›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Determining effects of non-synonymous SNPs on protein-protein interactions using supervised and semi-supervised learning.

Nan Zhao, Jing Ginger Han, Chi-Ren Shyu, Dmitry Korkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exome Sequencing uncovers Homozygous Stop-Gained variant in thePakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Mutations ofThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New GO-based measures in multiple network alignment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unraveling Extremely DamagingJournal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nan ZhaoInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Jing Ginger HanInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Chi-Ren ShyuInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America; Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Dmitry KorkinInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America; Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America; Bond Life Science Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are among the most common types of genetic variation in complex genetic disorders. A growing number of studies link the functional role of SNPs with the networks and pathways mediated by the disease-associated genes. For example, many non-synonymous missense SNPs (nsSNPs) have been found near or inside the protein-protein interaction (PPI) interfaces. Determining whether such nsSNP will disrupt or preserve a PPI is a challenging task to address, both experimentally and computationally. Here, we present this task as three related classification problems, and develop a new computational method, called the SNP-IN tool (non-synonymous SNP INteraction effect predictor). Our method predicts the effects of nsSNPs on PPIs, given the interaction's structure. It leverages supervised and semi-supervised feature-based classifiers, including our new Random Forest self-learning protocol. The classifiers are trained based on a dataset of comprehensive mutagenesis studies for 151 PPI complexes, with experimentally determined binding affinities of the mutant and wild-type interactions. Three classification problems were considered: (1) a 2-class problem (strengthening/weakening PPI mutations), (2) another 2-class problem (mutations that disrupt/preserve a PPI), and (3) a 3-class classification (detrimental/neutral/beneficial mutation effects). In total, 11 different supervised and semi-supervised classifiers were trained and assessed resulting in a promising performance, with the weighted f-measure ranging from 0.87 for Problem 1 to 0.70 for the most challenging Problem 3. By integrating prediction results of the 2-class classifiers into the 3-class classifier, we further improved its performance for Problem 3. To demonstrate the utility of SNP-IN tool, it was applied to study the nsSNP-induced rewiring of two disease-centered networks. The accurate and balanced performance of SNP-IN tool makes it readily available to study the rewiring of large-scale protein-protein interaction networks, and can be useful for functional annotation of disease-associated SNPs. SNIP-IN tool is freely accessible as a web-server at http://korkinlab.org/snpintool/.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsDiabetes MellitusGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPattern Recognition, AutomatedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein Interaction MappingProteomeProteome

Identifiers

PMID24784581
PMCPMC4006705
OpenAlexW2037048830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.