ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Determining effects of non-synonymous SNPs on protein-protein interactions using supervised and semi-supervised learning.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exome Sequencing uncovers Homozygous Stop-Gained variant in thePakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Mutations ofThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Review
- A quantitative comparison of the deleteriousness of missense and nonsense mutations using the structurally resolved human protein interactome.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- ProBASS-a language model with sequence and structural features for predicting the effect of mutations on binding affinity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Advances in MRGPRX2-mediated anaphylactoid reactions to traditional Chinese medicine injections.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- New GO-based measures in multiple network alignment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Gene expression networks regulated by human personality.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- Detection of autism spectrum disorder-related pathogenic trio variants by a novel structure-based approach.Molecular autism · 2024Article
- The Extent of Edgetic Perturbations in the Human Interactome Caused by Population-Specific Mutations.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Unraveling Extremely DamagingJournal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- PSnpBind-ML: predicting the effect of binding site mutations on protein-ligand binding affinity.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- SANA: cross-species prediction of Gene Ontology GO annotations via topological network alignment.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Article
- Determination of key residues in MRGPRX2 to enhance pseudo-allergic reactions induced by fluoroquinolones.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Are transient protein-protein interactions more dispensable?PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- HBD-2 variants and SARS-CoV-2: New insights into inter-individual susceptibility.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Structure analysis of deleterious nsSNPs in human PALB2 protein for functional inference.Bioinformation · 2021Article
- Using collections of structural models to predict changes of binding affinity caused by mutations in protein-protein interactions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Article
- MutaBind2: Predicting the Impacts of Single and Multiple Mutations on Protein-Protein Interactions.iScience · 2020Article
- Article
- Pathogenicity and functional impact of non-frameshifting insertion/deletion variation in the human genome.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are among the most common types of genetic variation in complex genetic disorders. A growing number of studies link the functional role of SNPs with the networks and pathways mediated by the disease-associated genes. For example, many non-synonymous missense SNPs (nsSNPs) have been found near or inside the protein-protein interaction (PPI) interfaces. Determining whether such nsSNP will disrupt or preserve a PPI is a challenging task to address, both experimentally and computationally. Here, we present this task as three related classification problems, and develop a new computational method, called the SNP-IN tool (non-synonymous SNP INteraction effect predictor). Our method predicts the effects of nsSNPs on PPIs, given the interaction's structure. It leverages supervised and semi-supervised feature-based classifiers, including our new Random Forest self-learning protocol. The classifiers are trained based on a dataset of comprehensive mutagenesis studies for 151 PPI complexes, with experimentally determined binding affinities of the mutant and wild-type interactions. Three classification problems were considered: (1) a 2-class problem (strengthening/weakening PPI mutations), (2) another 2-class problem (mutations that disrupt/preserve a PPI), and (3) a 3-class classification (detrimental/neutral/beneficial mutation effects). In total, 11 different supervised and semi-supervised classifiers were trained and assessed resulting in a promising performance, with the weighted f-measure ranging from 0.87 for Problem 1 to 0.70 for the most challenging Problem 3. By integrating prediction results of the 2-class classifiers into the 3-class classifier, we further improved its performance for Problem 3. To demonstrate the utility of SNP-IN tool, it was applied to study the nsSNP-induced rewiring of two disease-centered networks. The accurate and balanced performance of SNP-IN tool makes it readily available to study the rewiring of large-scale protein-protein interaction networks, and can be useful for functional annotation of disease-associated SNPs. SNIP-IN tool is freely accessible as a web-server at http://korkinlab.org/snpintool/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.