Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24783214›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

Significance of Lewis phenotyping using saliva and gastric tissue: comparison with the Lewis phenotype inferred from Lewis and secretor genotypes.

Yun Ji Hong, Sang Mee Hwang, Taek Soo Kim, Eun Young Song, Kyoung Un Park, Junghan Song, Kyou-Sup Han

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FUT2 gene as a genetic susceptible marker of infectious diseases: A Review.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Blood Groups in Infection and Host Susceptibility.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yun Ji HongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 173-82 Gumiro, Bundanggu, Seongnam, Gyeonggido 463-707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-5017
Sang Mee HwangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 173-82 Gumiro, Bundanggu, Seongnam, Gyeonggido 463-707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-1932
Taek Soo KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 173-82 Gumiro, Bundanggu, Seongnam, Gyeonggido 463-707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-1721
Eun Young SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Un ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 173-82 Gumiro, Bundanggu, Seongnam, Gyeonggido 463-707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-7633
Junghan SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 173-82 Gumiro, Bundanggu, Seongnam, Gyeonggido 463-707, Republic of Korea.
Kyou-Sup HanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lewis phenotypes using various types of specimen were compared with the Lewis phenotype predicted from Lewis and Secretor genotypes. This is the first logical step in explaining the association between the Lewis expression and Helicobacter pylori. We performed a study of the followings on 209 patients who underwent routine gastroscopy: erythrocyte and saliva Lewis phenotyping, gastric Lewis phenotyping by the tissue array, and the Lewis and Secretor genes genotyping. The results of phenotyping were as follows [Le(a-b-), Le(a+b-), Le(a-b+), and Le(a+b+), respectively, in order]: erythrocyte (12.4%, 25.8%, 61.2%, and 0.5%); saliva (2.4%, 27.3%, 70.3%, and 0.0%); gastric mucosa (8.1%, 6.7%, 45.5%, and 39.7%). The frequency of Le, le (59/508) , le (59/1067) , and le (59) alleles was 74.6%, 21.3%, 3.1%, and 1.0%, respectively, among 418 alleles. The saliva Lewis phenotype was completely consistent with the Lewis phenotype inferred from Lewis and Secretor genotypes, but that of gastric mucosa could not be predicted from genotypes. Lewis phenotyping using erythrocytes is only adequate for transfusion needs. Saliva testing for the Lewis phenotype is a more reliable method for determining the peripheral Lewis phenotype of an individual and the gastric Lewis phenotype must be used for the study on the association between Helicobacter pylori and the Lewis phenotype.

Indexed as

FucosyltransferasesGenotypeLewis Blood Group AntigensAdultErythrocytesFemaleGalactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferaseGastric MucosaGenotyping TechniquesHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMalePhenotypeSalivaFucosyltransferasesGalactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferaseLewis Blood Group Antigens

Identifiers

PMID24783214
PMCPMC3982271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.