Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24782839›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Effect of the soil type on the microbiome in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce.

Susanne Schreiter, Guo-Chun Ding, Holger Heuer, Günter Neumann, Martin Sandmann, Rita Grosch, Siegfried Kropf, Kornelia Smalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinct soil microbial community composition and structure: evidence from soil inside and outside the cattle farm.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Root Exudates in Soilless Culture Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanne SchreiterInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn-Institut Braunschweig, Germany ; Department of Plant Health, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Großbeeren/Erfurt e.V. Großbeeren, Germany.
Guo-Chun DingInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn-Institut Braunschweig, Germany ; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Holger HeuerInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn-Institut Braunschweig, Germany.
Günter NeumannInstitute of Crop Science (340h), Hohenheim University Stuttgart, Germany.
Martin SandmannDepartment of Plant Health, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Großbeeren/Erfurt e.V. Großbeeren, Germany.
Rita GroschDepartment of Plant Health, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Großbeeren/Erfurt e.V. Großbeeren, Germany.
Siegfried KropfDepartment for Biometrics und Medical Informatics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany.
Kornelia SmallaInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn-Institut Braunschweig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex and enormous diversity of microorganisms associated with plant roots is important for plant health and growth and is shaped by numerous factors. This study aimed to unravel the effects of the soil type on bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce. We used an experimental plot system with three different soil types that were stored at the same site for 10 years under the same agricultural management to reveal differences directly linked to the soil type and not influenced by other factors such as climate or cropping history. Bulk soil and rhizosphere samples were collected 3 and 7 weeks after planting. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from total community DNA by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and pyrosequencing revealed soil type dependent differences in the bacterial community structure of the bulk soils and the corresponding rhizospheres. The rhizosphere effect differed depending on the soil type and the plant growth developmental stage. Despite the soil type dependent differences in the bacterial community composition several genera such as Sphingomonas, Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, and Variovorax were significantly increased in the rhizosphere of lettuce grown in all three soils. The number of rhizosphere responders was highest 3 weeks after planting. Interestingly, in the soil with the highest numbers of responders the highest shoot dry weights were observed. Heatmap analysis revealed that many dominant operational taxonomic units were shared among rhizosphere samples of lettuce grown in diluvial sand, alluvial loam, and loess loam and that only a subset was increased in relative abundance in the rhizosphere compared to the corresponding bulk soil. The findings of the study provide insights into the effect of soil types on the rhizosphere microbiome of lettuce.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene analysisbacterial communitiesDGGELactuca sativapyrosequencingrhizosphere responders

Identifiers

PMID24782839
PMCPMC3986527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.