ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014
Cell division in Corynebacterineae.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning extracts MoA-specific signatures from high-throughput images of chemically and genetically perturbedScience advances · 2026Article
- Engineering bacterial cell morphology for the design of robust cell factories.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Chromosome structure and DNA replication dynamics during the life cycle of the predatory bacterium Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Eukaryotic-like gephyrin and cognate membrane receptor coordinate corynebacterial cell division and polar elongation.Nature microbiology · 2023Article
- Eukaryotic-like gephyrin and cognate membrane receptor coordinate corynebacterial cell division and polar elongation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Phenotypic and metabolic adaptations ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Single-cell growth inference ofeLife · 2021Article
- Stable inheritance of Sinorhizobium meliloti cell growth polarity requires an FtsN-like protein and an amidase.Nature communications · 2021Article
- LytR-CpsA-Psr Glycopolymer Transferases: Essential Bricks in Gram-Positive Bacterial Cell Wall Assembly.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Essential dynamic interdependence of FtsZ and SepF for Z-ring and septum formation in Corynebacterium glutamicum.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- DivIVA Controls Progeny Morphology and Diverse ParA Proteins Regulate Cell Division or Gliding Motility inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Chromosome Segregation Proteins as Coordinators of Cell Cycle in Response to Environmental Conditions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- ¡vIVA la DivIVA!Journal of bacteriology · 2019Review
- In Vivo Methods to Study Protein-Protein Interactions as Key Players inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- The conserved actinobacterial transcriptional regulator FtsR controls expression of ftsZ and further target genes and influences growth and cell division in Corynebacterium glutamicum.BMC microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial cells must coordinate a number of events during the cell cycle. Spatio-temporal regulation of bacterial cytokinesis is indispensable for the production of viable, genetically identical offspring. In many rod-shaped bacteria, precise midcell assembly of the division machinery relies on inhibitory systems such as Min and Noc. In rod-shaped Actinobacteria, for example Corynebacterium glutamicum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the divisome assembles in the proximity of the midcell region, however more spatial flexibility is observed compared to Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Actinobacteria represent a group of bacteria that spatially regulate cytokinesis in the absence of recognizable Min and Noc homologs. The key cell division steps in E. coli and B. subtilis have been subject to intensive study and are well-understood. In comparison, only a minimal set of positive and negative regulators of cytokinesis are known in Actinobacteria. Nonetheless, the timing of cytokinesis and the placement of the division septum is coordinated with growth as well as initiation of chromosome replication and segregation. We summarize here the current knowledge on cytokinesis and division site selection in the Actinobacteria suborder Corynebacterineae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.