Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24782823›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014

Magnesium: potential roles in neurovascular disease.

Jason J Chang, William J Mack, Jeffrey L Saver, Nerses Sanossian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prehospital neuroprotectant in combination with post-arrival thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Secondary analysis of the FAST-MAG prehospital trial.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Neuroprotective Strategies in Repair and Replacement of the Aortic Arch.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason J ChangDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA.
William J MackDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA ; The Roxanna Todd Hodges Comprehensive Stroke Clinic, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology, UCLA Stroke Center, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA , USA.
Nerses SanossianDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA ; The Roxanna Todd Hodges Comprehensive Stroke Clinic, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA.
University of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Los Angeles Basin Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2RR031991 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2011
$1.6M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR031991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMagnesium therapy has been studied extensively in pre-clinical and clinical trials in multiple organ systems. Cerebrovascular diseases may benefit from its neuroprotective properties. This review summarizes current studies of magnesium in a wide range of neurovascular diseases.

methodsWe searched relevant terms in the National Library of Medicine PubMed database and selected research including basic science, translational reports, meta-analyses, and clinical studies.

resultsStudies examining magnesium administration in ischemic stroke have failed to show any benefit in clinical outcome. Data on magnesium for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are limited. Preliminary investigations in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were promising, but definitive studies did not reveal differences in clinical outcome between magnesium and placebo-treated groups. Studies examining magnesium administration in global ischemia following cardiac arrest suggest a trend toward improved clinical outcome. The strongest evidence for clinically relevant neuroprotection following magnesium administration derives from studies of pre-term infants and patients undergoing cardiac bypass and carotid endarterectomy procedures. Magnesium was found to have an excellent safety profile across all investigations.

conclusionMagnesium is easy to administer and possesses a favorable safety profile. Its utility as a neuroprotectant in cardiac surgery, carotid endarterectomy, and pre-term infant hypoxia remain promising. Value as a therapeutic agent in ischemic stroke, ICH, and SAH is unclear and appears to be limited by late administration. Ongoing clinical trials assessing magnesium administration in the first hours following symptom onset may help clarify the role of magnesium therapy in these disease processes.

Indexed as

all cerebrovascular disease/strokeintracerebral hemorrhagemagnesiumneuroprotectionsubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID24782823
PMCPMC3995053
OpenAlexW2141864966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.