ReviewEndocrine pathology2014
Neuroendocrine pathology of the stomach: the Parma contribution.
Review in Endocrine pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomised clinical trial: a dose-ranging study of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2015Trial
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the stomach. Update on diagnostic criteria, classification, and prognostic markers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Gastric neuroendocrine tumors in aWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2021Review
- Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of the stomach: A rare case at an uncommon site.Medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current knowledge on gastric neuroendocrine pathology essentially developed in the last four decades. The historical evolution of the concepts and of the relevant clinical implications is described from the perspective of a group actively participating in this research domain. The histamine-producing enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells have been recognized as the leading cell type involved in the most significant alterations of gastric neuroendocrine cells. The trophic stimulus exerted by circulating gastrin has been demonstrated to have a crucial role on proliferative changes of ECL cells through a sequence of hyperplasia-dysplasia-neoplasia described by Solcia et al. (Digestion 41:185-200,1988). The development of ECL cell tumors in rats treated with toxicological doses of inhibitors of gastric acid secretion prompted appropriate anatomoclinical investigations proving the lack of tumor risk in humans when therapeutic dosages of the drugs are used. Moving from the comprehensive concept of gastric carcinoid, different types of neuroendocrine tumors have been identified in the stomach with substantial variations in prognosis and treatment options. In general, ECL cell tumors developed in hypergastrinemic conditions were found to behave better than those originating outside the setting of hormonal stimulation. Pathological features highly predictive of patient survival have been described. The genetic changes involved in tumor development and progression have revealed substantial overlapping with those of neuroendocrine tumors of other foregut derivatives (i.e., pancreas, duodenum, lung) delineating a family of neuroendocrine tumors genetically distinct from those of the distal parts of the digestive system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.