Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24781250›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Geographic population structure analysis of worldwide human populations infers their biogeographical origins.

Eran Elhaik, Tatiana Tatarinova, Dmitri Chebotarev, Ignazio S Piras, Carla Maria Calò, Antonella De Montis, Manuela Atzori, Monica Marini, Sergio Tofanelli, Paolo Francalacci and 23 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Major histocompatibility complex-associated odour preferences and human mate choice: near and far horizons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Systems biology analysis of human genomes points to key pathways conferring spina bifida risk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Eran Elhaik1] Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK [2] Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA [3].
Tatiana Tatarinova1] Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA [2].
Dmitri ChebotarevT.T. Chang Genetic Resources Center, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna , Philippines.
Ignazio S PirasDepartment of Sciences of Life and Environment, University of Cagliari, SS 554, Monserrato 09042, Italy.
Carla Maria CalòDepartment of Sciences of Life and Environment, University of Cagliari, SS 554, Monserrato 09042, Italy.
Antonella De MontisResearch Laboratories, bcs Biotech S.r.l., Viale Monastir 112, Cagliari 09122, Italy.
Manuela AtzoriResearch Laboratories, bcs Biotech S.r.l., Viale Monastir 112, Cagliari 09122, Italy.
Monica MariniResearch Laboratories, bcs Biotech S.r.l., Viale Monastir 112, Cagliari 09122, Italy.
Sergio TofanelliDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Ghini 13, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Paolo FrancalacciDepartment of Science of Nature and Territory, University of Sassari, Località Piandanna 07100, Italy.
Luca PaganiThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
Chris Tyler-SmithThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
Yali XueThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
Francesco CuccaDepartment of Sciences of Life and Environment, University of Cagliari, SS 554, Monserrato 09042, Italy.
Theodore G SchurrDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
Jill B GaieskiDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
Carlalynne MelendezDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
Miguel G VilarDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
Amanda C OwingsDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
Rocío GómezDepartamento de Toxicología, Cinvestav, San Pedro Zacatenco, CP 07360, Mexico.
Ricardo FujitaInstituto de Genética y Biología Molecular, University of San Martin de Porres, Lima, Peru.
Fabrício R SantosDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, CEP 31270-901, Brazil.
David ComasInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Departament de Ciences de la Salut i de la Vida, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Oleg Balanovsky1] Vavilov Institute for General Genetics: 119991, Moscow, Russia [2] Research Centre for Medical Genetics: 115478, Moscow, Russia.
Elena BalanovskaResearch Centre for Medical Genetics: 115478, Moscow, Russia.
Pierre ZallouaThe Lebanese American University, Chouran, Beirut 1102 2801, Lebanon.
Himla SoodyallNational Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham 2131, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ramasamy PitchappanThe Genographic Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arunkumar GaneshprasadThe Genographic Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, Tamil Nadu, India.
Michael HammerDepartment of ecology and evolutionary biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Lisa Matisoo-SmithDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
R Spencer WellsNational Geographic Society, Washington, District of Columbia 20036, USA.
Genographic Consortium

Funding

Populaton Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Optimal ControlR01GM068968 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NEELY, MICHAEL N. · 2003 to 2015
$3.9M
Mechanisms of Hypothermic Neuroprotection in NeonatesR01HD070996 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NORTHINGTON, FRANCES J · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD070996NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070996NIGMS NIH HHS GM068968NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068968Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for a method that utilizes biological information to predict humans' place of origin has occupied scientists for millennia. Over the past four decades, scientists have employed genetic data in an effort to achieve this goal but with limited success. While biogeographical algorithms using next-generation sequencing data have achieved an accuracy of 700 km in Europe, they were inaccurate elsewhere. Here we describe the Geographic Population Structure (GPS) algorithm and demonstrate its accuracy with three data sets using 40,000-130,000 SNPs. GPS placed 83% of worldwide individuals in their country of origin. Applied to over 200 Sardinians villagers, GPS placed a quarter of them in their villages and most of the rest within 50 km of their villages. GPS's accuracy and power to infer the biogeography of worldwide individuals down to their country or, in some cases, village, of origin, underscores the promise of admixture-based methods for biogeography and has ramifications for genetic ancestry testing.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEuropeGenetics, PopulationGenome, HumanHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID24781250
PMCPMC4007635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.