Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24781024›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2014

Incidence and molecular diversity of Acanthamoeba species isolated from public baths in Hungary.

Csaba Kiss, Zsófia Barna, Márta Vargha, Júlia Katalin Török

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Identification and genotyping ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Isolation and Molecular Identification ofIranian journal of parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Csaba KissGovernment Office of Győr-Moson-Sopron County Policy Administration Services of Public Health, Győr, Hungary, kiss.csaba@nydr.antsz.hu.
Zsófia Barna
Márta Vargha
Júlia Katalin Török
University of Sopron · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hungary has a large number of thermal baths and spa facilities which attract hundreds of thousands of tourists annually. Until recently, however, the free-living amoebae were not of public health concern. Genotyping of Acanthamoeba species, potential agents of keratitis and granulomatous encephalitis, was carried out in 20 Hungarian public baths for the first time to assess the incidence and molecular diversity of the genus in the country. Our results show that 6.7% of the samples were positive for Acanthamoeba. Of these positive samples, 6.5 and 7% was from sterilized and unsterilized pools, respectively. The 18S rRNA gene investigation of the nine Acanthamoeba strains found reveals that seven belong to the hazardous T4 genotype. The remaining two samples were of the T15 type. All the strains kept growing at 36 °C. Our results underline the need to develop a control system for free-living amoebae and supervise the disinfection of Hungarian public baths.

Indexed as

PhylogenyPublic FacilitiesAcanthamoebaAmebiasisBathsEpidemiological MonitoringFresh WaterGenes, rRNAGenotypeHumansHungaryIncidenceRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID24781024
OpenAlexW2004567155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.