Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24780936›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2015

Defining young in the context of prostate cancer.

Suzanne K Chambers, Anthony Lowe, Melissa K Hyde, Leah Zajdlewicz, Robert A Gardiner, David Sandoe, Jeff Dunn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Scoping Review of Stigma Related to Prostate Cancer in Black Men.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suzanne K ChambersGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Perth, Queensland, Australia Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia suzanne.chambers@griffith.edu.au.
Anthony LoweGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Melissa K HydeGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia.
Leah ZajdlewiczCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Robert A GardinerHealth and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Perth, Queensland, Australia Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David SandoeProstate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jeff DunnGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of prostate cancer is for most men a major life stress with the psychological burden of this disease falling more heavily on those who are younger. Despite this, being young as it applies to prostate cancer is not yet clearly defined with varied chronological approaches applied. However, men's responses to health crises are closely bound to life course and masculinities from which social roles emerge. This paper applied qualitative methodology (structured focus groups and semistructured interviews with expert informants) using interpretative phenomenological analysis to define what it means to be young and have prostate cancer. Structured focus groups were held with 26 consumer advisors (men diagnosed with prostate cancer who provide support to other men with prostate cancer or raise community awareness) and health professionals. As well, 15 men diagnosed with prostate cancer and in their 40s, 50s, or 60s participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants discussed the attributes that describe a young man with prostate cancer and the experience of being young and diagnosed with prostate cancer. Chronological definitions of a young man were absent or inconsistent. Masculine constructions of what it means to be a young man and life course characteristics appear more relevant to defining young as it applies to prostate cancer compared with chronological age. These findings have implications for better understanding the morbidities associated with this illness, and in designing interventions that are oriented to life course and helping young men reconstruct their identities after prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancyQuality of LifeAdultAgedAge FactorsAge of OnsetAgingFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMasculinityMen's HealthMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsQualitative Researchidentitylife coursemasculinityprostate cancersocial roles

Identifiers

PMID24780936
PMCPMC4361457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.