Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24780734›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2014

Keeping at arm's length during regeneration.

Valerie A Tornini, Kenneth D Poss

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic Regulation of Organ Regeneration in Zebrafish.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Regeneration Genetics.Annual review of genetics · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic landscape of positional memory in the caudal fin of zebrafish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerie A TorniniDepartment of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Kenneth D PossDepartment of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: kenneth.poss@duke.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of a lost appendage in adult amphibians and fish is a remarkable feat of developmental patterning. Although the limb or fin may be years removed from its initial creation by an embryonic primordium, the blastema that emerges at the injury site fashions a close mimic of adult form. Central to understanding these events are revealing the cellular origins of new structures, how positional identity is maintained, and the determinants for completion. Each of these topics has been advanced recently, strengthening models for how complex tissue pattern is recalled in the adult context.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnimal FinsAnimalsBody PatterningExtremitiesFishesRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID24780734
PMCPMC4052447
OpenAlexW2061468450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.