Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24780375›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2014

Peptide entry inhibitors of enveloped viruses: the importance of interfacial hydrophobicity.

Hussain Badani, Robert F Garry, William C Wimley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Deoxyshikonin Inhibits Influenza A Virus Infection at an Early Stage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Harnessing Antiviral Peptides: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antiviral Approaches against Influenza Virus.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hussain BadaniDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Robert F GarryDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
William C WimleyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. Electronic address: wwimley@tulane.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many peptides known that inhibit the entry of enveloped viruses into cells, including one peptide that is successfully being used in the clinic as a drug. In this review, we discuss the discovery, antiviral activity and mechanism of action of such peptides. While peptide entry inhibitors have been discovered by a wide variety of approaches (structure-based, accidental, intentional, rational and brute force) we show here that they share a common physical chemical property: they are at least somewhat hydrophobic and/or amphipathic and have a propensity to interact with membrane interfaces. We propose that this propensity drives a shared mechanism of action for many peptide entry inhibitors, involving direct interactions with viral and cellular membranes, as well as interactions with the complex hydrophobic protein/lipid interfaces that are exposed, at least transiently, during virus-cell fusion. By interacting simultaneously with the membrane interfaces and other critical hydrophobic surfaces, we hypothesize that peptide entry inhibitors can act by changing the physical chemistry of the membranes, and the fusion protein interfaces bridging them, and by doing so interfere with the fusion of cellular and viral membranes. Based on this idea, we propose that an approach that focuses on the interfacial hydrophobicity of putative entry inhibitors could lead to the efficient discovery of novel, broad-spectrum viral entry inhibitors. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Interfacially Active Peptides and Proteins. Guest Editors: William C. Wimley and Kalina Hristova.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneGenome, ViralHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMembrane FusionMembranesPeptidesProtein ConformationViral Envelope ProteinsViral Fusion ProteinsVirionPeptidesViral Envelope ProteinsViral Fusion ProteinsEntry inhibitorEnveloped virusFusion proteinInterfacial hydrophobicityPeptide

Identifiers

PMID24780375
PMCPMC7094693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.