Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24778934›Full record

ReviewWorm2013

Deep sequencing strategies for mapping and identifying mutations from genetic screens.

Steven Zuryn, Sophie Jarriault

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Worm, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive virome analysis ofFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven ZurynInstitut de GA(c)nA(c)tique et de Biologie MolA(c)culaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC); Institut National de la SantA(c) et de la Recherche MA(c)dicale (INSERM) U964/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 1704/UniversitA(c) de Strasbourg; Strasbourg, France.
Sophie JarriaultInstitut de GA(c)nA(c)tique et de Biologie MolA(c)culaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC); Institut National de la SantA(c) et de la Recherche MA(c)dicale (INSERM) U964/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 1704/UniversitA(c) de Strasbourg; Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled rapid and cost effective whole genome sequencing. This technology has allowed researchers to shortcut time-consuming and laborious methods used to identify nucleotide mutations in forward genetic screens in model organisms. However, causal mutations must still be mapped to a region of the genome so as to aid in their identification. This can be achieved simultaneously with deep sequencing through various methods. Here we discuss alternative deep sequencing strategies for simultaneously mapping and identifying causal mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans from mutagenesis screens. Focusing on practical considerations, such as the particular mutant phenotype obtained, this review aims to aid the reader in choosing which strategy to adopt to successfully clone their mutant.

Indexed as

C. elegansdeep sequencingEMSforward geneticsgenetic mappingnext-generation sequencingNGSSNP mappingWGSwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID24778934
PMCPMC3875646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.