Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24778546›Full record

ArticleEvolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society2014

The marginal valuation of fertility.

James Holland Jones, Rebecca Bliege Bird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Contributions of evolutionary anthropology to understanding climate-induced human migration.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolutionary demography of age at last birth: integrating approaches from human behavioural ecology and cultural evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic evidence for natural selection in humans in the contemporary United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding variation in human fertility: what can we learn from evolutionary demography?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  15. Why do women stop reproducing before menopause? A life-history approach to age at last birth.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  16. Measuring selection in human populations using the growth rate per generation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  17. Measuring selective constraint on fertility in human life histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James Holland JonesDepartment of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rebecca Bliege BirdDepartment of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

CORE--PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTP30AG017253 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATTACHARYA, JAY · 1999 to 2019
$5.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial theoretical and empirical evidence demonstrates that fertility entails economic, physiological, and demographic trade-offs. The existence of trade-offs suggests that fitness should be maximized by an intermediate level of fertility, but this hypothesis has not had much support in the human life-history literature. We suggest that the difficulty of finding intermediate optima may be a function of the way fitness is calculated. Evolutionary analyses of human behavior typically use lifetime reproductive success as their fitness criterion. This fitness measure implicitly assumes that women are indifferent to the timing of reproduction and that they are risk-neutral in their reproductive decision-making. In this paper, we offer an alternative, easily-calculated fitness measure that accounts for differences in reproductive timing and yields clear preferences in the face of risky reproductive decision-making. Using historical demographic data from a genealogically-detailed dataset from 19th century Utah, we show that this measure is highly concave with respect to reproductive effort. This result has three major implications: (1) if births are properly timed, a lower-fertility reproductive strategy can have the same fitness as a high-fertility strategy, (2) intermediate optima are far more likely using fitness measures that are strongly concave with respect to effort, (3) we expect mothers to have strong investment preferences with respect to the risk inherent in reproduction.

Indexed as

DemographyFertilityHuman evolutionLife history theoryReproductive effortUtah

Identifiers

PMID24778546
PMCPMC4000044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.