Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24778215›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Declines in large wildlife increase landscape-level prevalence of rodent-borne disease in Africa.

Hillary S Young, Rodolfo Dirzo, Kristofer M Helgen, Douglas J McCauley, Sarah A Billeter, Michael Y Kosoy, Lynn M Osikowicz, Daniel J Salkeld, Truman P Young, Katharina Dittmar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mutilation of the tree of life via mass extinction of animal genera.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Wildlife susceptibility to infectious diseases at global scales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. An eco-epidemiological modeling approach to investigate dilution effect in two different tick-borne pathosystems.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Hillary S YoungDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;Department of Biology andDivision of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013;
Rodolfo DirzoDepartment of Biology and rdirzo@stanford.edu.
Kristofer M HelgenDivision of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013;
Douglas J McCauleyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;Department of Biology and.
Sarah A BilleterDivision of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO 80521; rdirzo@stanford.edu.
Michael Y KosoyDivision of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO 80521;
Lynn M OsikowiczDivision of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO 80521;
Daniel J SalkeldDepartment of Biology, Colorado Sate University, Fort Collins, CO 80523;Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Truman P YoungDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and.
Katharina DittmarDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260.
National Center for Infectious Diseases · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Museum of Natural History · USPalo Alto Institute · USSmithsonian Institution · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations of large wildlife are declining on local and global scales. The impacts of this pulse of size-selective defaunation include cascading changes to smaller animals, particularly rodents, and alteration of many ecosystem processes and services, potentially involving changes to prevalence and transmission of zoonotic disease. Understanding linkages between biodiversity loss and zoonotic disease is important for both public health and nature conservation programs, and has been a source of much recent scientific debate. In the case of rodent-borne zoonoses, there is strong conceptual support, but limited empirical evidence, for the hypothesis that defaunation, the loss of large wildlife, increases zoonotic disease risk by directly or indirectly releasing controls on rodent density. We tested this hypothesis by experimentally excluding large wildlife from a savanna ecosystem in East Africa, and examining changes in prevalence and abundance of Bartonella spp. infection in rodents and their flea vectors. We found no effect of wildlife removal on per capita prevalence of Bartonella infection in either rodents or fleas. However, because rodent and, consequently, flea abundance doubled following experimental defaunation, the density of infected hosts and infected fleas was roughly twofold higher in sites where large wildlife was absent. Thus, defaunation represents an elevated risk in Bartonella transmission to humans (bartonellosis). Our results (i) provide experimental evidence of large wildlife defaunation increasing landscape-level disease prevalence, (ii) highlight the importance of susceptible host regulation pathways and host/vector density responses in biodiversity-disease relationships, and (iii) suggest that rodent-borne disease responses to large wildlife loss may represent an important context where this relationship is largely negative.

Indexed as

XenopsyllaAfrica, EasternAnimalsAnimals, WildBartonella InfectionsBiodiversityEcosystemFlea InfestationsHumansKenyaLice InfestationsPrevalenceRisk FactorsRodent DiseasesRodentiaZoonosesdilution effectKenya

Identifiers

PMID24778215
PMCPMC4024866
OpenAlexW2154261096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.