Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24777883›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2014

Complete response after autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma.

Lalit Kumar, Nida Iqbal, Anjali Mookerjee, Rakesh Kumar Verma, Om D Sharma, Atul Batra, Raja Pramanik, Ritu Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Single Centre Experience from North India.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Controversies in multiple myeloma: to transplant or not?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lalit KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology and Laboratory Oncology Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 11 00 29, India.
Nida Iqbal
Anjali Mookerjee
Rakesh Kumar Verma
Om D Sharma
Atul Batra
Raja Pramanik
Ritu Gupta
DR. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated long-term outcome of patients achieving complete response (CR) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma. Between April 1990 and June 2012 191 patients underwent ASCT. The median age was 53 years (range, 26-68 years), 135 were men. Pretransplant, patients received induction therapy with VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone; n = 77), novel agents (n = 92), or alkylating agent-based, n = 22); 43% received more than one line of induction regimen. Response to transplant was defined as per EBMT criteria. The median follow-up for the entire group was 85 months (range, 6-232.5 months). Following transplant 109 (57.1%) patients achieved CR. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with CR was higher compared to those with VGPR and PR, (107 vs. 18 vs. 18 months, P < 0.001). Number of lines of therapy pretransplant (one or two vs. more than two lines of therapy (P < 0.001), and absolute lymphocyte count of ≤ 3000/cmm were predictors of superior PFS. Median overall survival (OS) for patients with CR was higher, (204 months), compared to those with VGPR (71.5 months, P < 0.001) and PR (51.5 months, P < 0.001), respectively. On Cox regression analysis, patients who received one line of induction therapy pretransplant (hazard ratio, HR 2.154, P < 0.001) and those with absolute lymphocyte count of ≤ 3000/mm(3) (HR 0.132, P < 0.001) had superior PFS. For overall survival, induction treatment up to one line (HR 2.403, P < 0.004) and Hb > 7.1 G/dL at diagnosis (HR 4.756, P < 0.01) were associated with superior outcome. On landmark analysis at 12 months, PFS and OS continued to remain superior for patients attaining CR. Achievement of CR post transplant is associated with longer OS and PFS. Among complete responders, those who receive one line of induction therapy pretransplant have superior outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAdult Stem CellsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAutograftsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesAutologous stem cell transplantcomplete responsemultiple myelomapretransplant therapy

Identifiers

PMID24777883
PMCPMC4303161
OpenAlexW2044287664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.