Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24777435›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2014

Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Sheraz R Markar, Henner Schmidt, Sonia Kunz, Artur Bodnar, Michal Hubka, Donald E Low

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lessons learned from 150 total gastrectomies for prevention of cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated care · 2017
    Article
  17. Evolution in the Treatment of Esophageal Disease at a Single Academic Institution: 2004-2013.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2017
    Article
  18. Regional Multiteam Systems in Cancer Care Delivery.Journal of oncology practice · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheraz R MarkarDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA, 98111, USA.
Henner Schmidt
Sonia Kunz
Artur Bodnar
Michal Hubka
Donald E Low
Seattle University · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation and evolution of a multidisciplinary esophagectomy care pathway on postoperative outcomes over a 20-year experience. STUDY

designAll patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 1991 and 2012 were included. Patients were divided into four groups (Gp1 1991-1996, Gp2 1997-2002, Gp3 2003-2007, and Gp4 2008-2012).

resultsFive hundred and ninety-five patients were included (Gp1 92, Gp2 159, Gp3 161, and Gp4 183). Age remained consistent over time; however, a progressive significant increase was observed in BMI and Charlson comorbidity index. Increases were also noted in patients with clinical stage III cancers, in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, in salvage esophagectomy and in the utilization of pretreatment jejunostomy. We observed a significant reduction in estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative room IV fluid administration (ORFA) during the study period. Median ICU stay and length of hospital stay (LOS) (10 (5-50) to 8 (5-115) days) decreased over time. In-hospital mortality (0.3 %) and postoperative complications remained consistent over time. cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis showed that EBL, ORFA, and LOS all declined during the study period, reaching mean values at case 120, 310, and 175, respectively.

conclusionsThe results of this study show that process improvement within the pathway is likely more significant than the level of comorbidities, application of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, or technical approach in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyCritical PathwaysDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemale

Identifiers

PMID24777435
OpenAlexW2058518024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.