Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24777334›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Combination of radiofrequency ablation with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: an up-to-date meta-analysis.

Zhenyin Liu, Fei Gao, Guang Yang, Sristi Singh, Mingjian Lu, Tao Zhang, Zhihui Zhong, Fujun Zhang, Rijie Tang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mathematical modeling of mass and energy transport for thermoembolization.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenyin LiuDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Fei Gao
Guang Yang
Sristi Singh
Mingjian Lu
Tao Zhang
Zhihui Zhong
Fujun Zhang
Rijie Tang
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with that of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Randomized controlled trials comparing RFA plus TACE with RFA alone for HCC were included into this meta-analysis, and the search strategy followed the requirement of the Cochrane Library Handbook. Overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were analyzed and compared by using Review Manager (version 5). We identified 7 randomized controlled trials comprising 571 patients who were treated by RFA plus TACE versus RFA alone for HCC. Meta-analyses showed that the combination of RFA and TACE was associated with a significantly higher overall survival rates (OR1 year = 2.39, 95 % CI, 1.35-4.21, P = 0.003; OR3 years = 1.85, 95 %CI 1.26-2.71, P = 0.002), and recurrence-free survival rate (OR1 year = 2.00, 95 % CI 1.26-3.18, P = 0.003; OR3 years = 2.13, 95 %CI 1.41-3.20, P < 0.001). Additionally, the quality of the evidence was high for the 1- and 3-year survival rate; no evidence of publication bias was observed. The combination of RFA with TACE can improve the overall survival rate and the recurrence-free survival rate for patients with HCC.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationChemoembolization, TherapeuticCarcinoma, HepatocellularCombined Modality TherapyHumansLiver NeoplasmsPublication BiasSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID24777334
OpenAlexW2008590445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.