Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24772323›Full record

ArticleActa naturae2014

Williams syndrome as a model for elucidation of the pathway genes - the brain - cognitive functions: genetics and epigenetics.

E A Nikitina, A V Medvedeva, G A Zakharov, E V Savvateeva-Popova

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in genetics · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E A NikitinaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Makarova, 6, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia ; Herzen State Pedagogical University, nab. r. Moyki, 48, 191186, St. Petersburg, Russia.
A V MedvedevaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Makarova, 6, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia ; Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 8-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia.
G A ZakharovPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Makarova, 6, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia ; Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 8-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia.
E V Savvateeva-PopovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Makarova, 6, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia ; Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 8-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUHerzen University · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic diseases or syndromes with multiple manifestations arise spontaneously and unpredictably as a result of contiguous deletions and duplications generated by unequal recombination in chromosomal regions with a specific architecture. The Williams syndrome is believed to be one of the most attractive models for linking genes, the brain, behavior and cognitive functions. It is a neurogenetic disorder resulting from a 1.5 Mb deletion at 7q11.23 which covers more than 20 genes; the hemizigosity of these genes leads to multiple manifestations, with the behavioral ones comprising three distinct domains: 1) visuo-spatial orientation; 2) verbal and linguistic defect; and 3) hypersocialisation. The shortest observed deletion leads to hemizigosity in only two genes: eln and limk1. Therefore, the first gene is supposed to be responsible for cardiovascular pathology; and the second one, for cognitive pathology. Since cognitive pathology diminishes with a patient's age, the original idea of the crucial role of genes straightforwardly determining the brain's morphology and behavior was substituted by ideas of the brain's plasticity and the necessity of finding epigenetic factors that affect brain development and the functions manifested as behavioral changes. Recently, non-coding microRNAs (miRs) began to be considered as the main players in these epigenetic events. This review tackles the following problems: is it possible to develop relatively simple model systems to analyze the contribution of both a single gene and the consequences of its epigenetic regulation in the formation of the Williams syndrome's cognitive phenotype? Is it possible to use Drosophila as a simple model system?

Indexed as

DrosophilaLIMK1non-coding RNAsWilliams syndrome

Identifiers

PMID24772323
PMCPMC3999462
OpenAlexW2130748498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.