Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24772239›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2014

Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review.

Venkata Ramesh Dasari, Krishna Kumar Veeravalli, Dzung H Dinh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of stem cells, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02482194 (Autologous Transplantation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients of Spinal Cord Injury-Phase I Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02482194 phase1completednot on this map

Autologous Transplantation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients of Spinal Cord Injury-Phase I Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), PakistanRan2013 to 2016Enrolled9ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsmesenchymal stem cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venkata Ramesh DasariVenkata Ramesh Dasari, Krishna Kumar Veeravalli, Department of Cancer Biology and Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61656, United States.
Krishna Kumar VeeravalliVenkata Ramesh Dasari, Krishna Kumar Veeravalli, Department of Cancer Biology and Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61656, United States.
Dzung H DinhVenkata Ramesh Dasari, Krishna Kumar Veeravalli, Department of Cancer Biology and Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61656, United States.
Illinois College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With technological advances in basic research, the intricate mechanism of secondary delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) continues to unravel at a rapid pace. However, despite our deeper understanding of the molecular changes occurring after initial insult to the spinal cord, the cure for paralysis remains elusive. Current treatment of SCI is limited to early administration of high dose steroids to mitigate the harmful effect of cord edema that occurs after SCI and to reduce the cascade of secondary delayed SCI. Recent evident-based clinical studies have cast doubt on the clinical benefit of steroids in SCI and intense focus on stem cell-based therapy has yielded some encouraging results. An array of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from various sources with novel and promising strategies are being developed to improve function after SCI. In this review, we briefly discuss the pathophysiology of spinal cord injuries and characteristics and the potential sources of MSCs that can be used in the treatment of SCI. We will discuss the progress of MSCs application in research, focusing on the neuroprotective properties of MSCs. Finally, we will discuss the results from preclinical and clinical trials involving stem cell-based therapy in SCI.

Indexed as

Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cellsBone marrow stromal cellsMesenchymal stem cellsSpinal cord injuryUmbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID24772239
PMCPMC3999770
OpenAlexW2165985696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.