Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24772085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2014

External and circadian inputs modulate synaptic protein expression in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Wojciech Krzeptowski, Jolanta Górska-Andrzejak, Ewelina Kijak, Alicja Görlich, Elżbieta Guzik, Gareth Moore, Elżbieta M Pyza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wojciech KrzeptowskiDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Jolanta Górska-AndrzejakDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Ewelina KijakDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Alicja GörlichDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Elżbieta GuzikDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Gareth MooreDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Elżbieta M PyzaDepartment of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster the retina photoreceptors form tetrad synapses with the first order interneurons, amacrine cells and glial cells in the first optic neuropil (lamina), in order to transmit photic and visual information to the brain. Using the specific antibodies against synaptic proteins; Bruchpilot (BRP), Synapsin (SYN), and Disc Large (DLG), the synapses in the distal lamina were specifically labeled. Then their abundance was measured as immunofluorescence intensity in flies held in light/dark (LD 12:12), constant darkness (DD), and after locomotor and light stimulation. Moreover, the levels of proteins (SYN and DLG), and mRNAs of the brp, syn, and dlg genes, were measured in the fly's head and brain, respectively. In the head we did not detect SYN and DLG oscillations. We found, however, that in the lamina, DLG oscillates in LD 12:12 and DD but SYN cycles only in DD. The abundance of all synaptic proteins was also changed in the lamina after locomotor and light stimulation. One hour locomotor stimulations at different time points in LD 12:12 affected the pattern of the daily rhythm of synaptic proteins. In turn, light stimulations in DD increased the level of all proteins studied. In the case of SYN, however, this effect was observed only after a short light pulse (15 min). In contrast to proteins studied in the lamina, the mRNA of brp, syn, and dlg genes in the brain was not cycling in LD 12:12 and DD, except the mRNA of dlg in LD 12:12. Our earlier results and obtained in the present study showed that the abundance of BRP, SYN and DLG in the distal lamina, at the tetrad synapses, is regulated by light and a circadian clock while locomotor stimulation affects their daily pattern of expression. The observed changes in the level of synaptic markers reflect the circadian plasticity of tetrad synapses regulated by the circadian clock and external inputs, both specific and unspecific for the visual system.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmslight stimulationlocomotor activitysynaptic plasticitythe first optic neuropil

Identifiers

PMID24772085
PMCPMC3982107
OpenAlexW1992156269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.