Perspectives: Microvascular endothelial dysfunction and gender.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. The predictors of no reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.Indian heart journal · 2018
   Pooled it
2. Preserved Function of Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells in Female Rats with Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Protection Against Arterial Hypertension and Arterial Stiffness?Cells · 2026
   Article
3. Sexual Dimorphism in Cardiometabolic Diseases: From Development to Senescence and Therapeutic Approaches.Cells · 2025
   Review
4. Combined Therapy with Anthracyclines and GnRH Analogues for Breast Cancer: Impact on Ischemic Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
   Review
5. Mechanisms and clinical implications of endothelium-dependent vasomotor dysfunction in coronary microvasculature.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
   Review
6. Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Review
7. Human Umbilical Cord: Information Mine in Sex-Specific Medicine.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
   Review
8. ESC Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation position paper on 'coronary microvascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease'.Cardiovascular research · 2020
   Review
9. Experimental animal models of coronary microvascular dysfunction.Cardiovascular research · 2020
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.