Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24771847›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2014

Evaluation of clinical criteria for the identification of Lynch syndrome among unselected patients with endometrial cancer.

Amanda S Bruegl, Bojana Djordjevic, Brittany Batte, Molly Daniels, Bryan Fellman, Diana Urbauer, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Charlotte Sun, Karen H Lu, Russell R Broaddus

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The proportion of endometrial cancers associated with Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Context-dependent environmental associations with endometrial cancer histotype and genotype.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Germline multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing in an unselected endometrial cancer cohort.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amanda S BrueglAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine.
Bojana DjordjevicDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Brittany BatteAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine.
Molly DanielsAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine.
Bryan FellmanBiostatistics.
Diana UrbauerBiostatistics.
Rajyalakshmi LuthraHematopathology, and.
Charlotte SunAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine.
Karen H LuAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine.
Russell R BroaddusPathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and rbroaddus@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS 2P50 CA098258-08NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical criteria, primarily young age of cancer onset and family history of signature cancers, have been developed to identify individuals at elevated risk for Lynch syndrome with the goals of early identification and cancer prevention. In 2007, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO)-codified criteria for women presenting with gynecologic cancers. These criteria have not been validated in a population-based setting. For 412 unselected endometrial cancers, immunohistochemical expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins and MLH1 methylation were assessed to classify tumors as sporadic or probable Lynch syndrome (PLS). In this cohort, 10.5% of patients were designated as PLS based on tumor testing. The sensitivity and specificity of the SGO criteria to identify these same cases were 32.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.2-48.5] and 77% (95% CI, 72.7-81.8), respectively. With the exception of tumor location in the lower uterine segment, multivariate analysis of clinical features, family history, and pathologic variables failed to identify significant differences between the sporadic and PLS groups. A simplified cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that the SGO clinical criteria and universal tissue testing strategies had comparable costs per patient with PLS identified. In conclusion, the SGO criteria successfully identify PLS cases among women with endometrial cancer who are young or have significant family history of signature tumors. However, a larger proportion of patients with PLS who are older and have less significant family history are not detected by this screening strategy. Universal tissue testing may be necessary to capture more individuals at risk for having Lynch syndrome.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationDNA Repair EnzymesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenosine TriphosphatasesBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesG-T mismatch-binding proteinMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MLH1 protein, humanMSH2 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsPMS2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24771847
PMCPMC4090057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.