Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24771845›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

The influence of children's day care on antibiotic seeking: a mixed methods study.

Leila Rooshenas, Fiona Wood, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Meirion R Evans, Christopher C Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health and Psychological Predictors of Antibiotic Use in Infancy and Fathers' Role.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Paediatric antibiotic prescriptions in primary care in the Alpes-Maritimes area of southeastern France between 2008 and 2013.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  14. Nursery sickness policies and their influence on prescribing for conjunctivitis: audit and questionnaire survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  15. Evaluation of Drug Treatment of Bronchopneumonia at the Pediatric Clinic in Sarajevo.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leila RooshenasSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol; and Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Fiona Wood
Lucy Brookes-Howell
Meirion R Evans
Christopher C Butler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreschool-aged children are the highest consumers of antibiotics, but consult mainly for viral infections. Little is known about how day care, which is common in this age group, influences primary care consulting and treatment-seeking behaviours.

aimTo investigate daycare providers' approaches to excluding and/or readmitting children with infections, and the consequences for parents' consulting and antibiotic-seeking behaviours. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional survey, document analysis, and qualitative interviews of daycare providers and parents in South East Wales, UK.

methodA total of 328 daycare providers were asked to complete a survey about infection exclusion practices and to provide a copy of their sickness exclusion policy. Next, 52 semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected questionnaire responders and parents using their services. Questionnaire responses underwent bivariate analysis, policies underwent document analysis, and interviews were thematically analysed using constant comparison methods.

resultsIn total 217 out of 328 (66%) daycare providers responded; 82 out of 199 (41%) reported advising parents that their child may need antibiotics and 199 out of 214 (93%) reported advising general practice consultations. Interviews confirmed that such advice was routine, and beliefs about antibiotic indications often went against clinical guidelines: 24% (n = 136) of sickness exclusion policies mentioning infections made at least one non-evidence-based indication for 'treatment' or antibiotics. Parent interviews revealed that negotiating daycare requirements lowered thresholds for consulting and encouraged antibiotic seeking.

conclusionDaycare providers encourage parents to consult general practice and seek antibiotics through non-evidence-based policies and practices. Parents' perceptions of daycare providers' requirements override their own beliefs of when it is appropriate to consult and seek treatment.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersAnti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInterviews as TopicMaleMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticschildrenday caregeneral practiceinfectionqualitative

Identifiers

PMID24771845
PMCPMC4001146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.