Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24771713›Full record

ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2014

Evaluation of the interaction between phosphohistidine analogues and phosphotyrosine binding domains.

Tom E McAllister, Katherine A Horner, Michael E Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in development of new tools for the study of phosphohistidine.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Advances in Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tom E McAllisterSchool of Chemistry and Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT (UK) http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/MEW/
Katherine A Horner
Michael E Webb

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have investigated the interaction of peptides containing phosphohistidine analogues and their homologues with the prototypical phosphotyrosine binding SH2 domain from the eukaryotic cell signalling protein Grb2 by using a combination of isothermal titration calorimetry and a fluorescence anisotropy competition assay. These investigations demonstrated that the triazole class of phosphohistidine analogues are capable of binding too, suggesting that phosphohistidine could potentially be detected by this class of proteins in vivo.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCalorimetryEukaryotic CellsFluorescence PolarizationGRB2 Adaptor ProteinHistidineHumansMolecular ConformationPeptidesPhosphotyrosinesrc Homology DomainsTriazolesGRB2 Adaptor ProteinGRB2 protein, humanHistidinePeptidesphosphohistidinePhosphotyrosineTriazolescell signalingphosphohistidinephosphotyrosineprotein modificationssynthetic analogues

Identifiers

PMID24771713
PMCPMC4159583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.