ReviewClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2014
Emerging technologies for rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens.
Review in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates- a multicentre hospital cohort study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019Trial
- Balancing Speed and Cost: Economic Insights from Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Bloodstream Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical effect of in-house rapid diagnostic process on patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria or methicillin-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- The role of rapid molecular diagnostics in managing bloodstream infections: a microbiological insight.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Veterinary blood culture diagnostic testing: methodology and results from a German single-center study on dogs (2014-2022).Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Isolation and identification of bacteria from blood within 12 h using standard laboratory equipment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification and characterization of an invasive, hyper-aerotolerantASM case reports · 2025Article
- Performance of ddPCR-GNB for microbial diagnosis of suspected bloodstream infection due to the four most common gram-negative bacteria: a prospective, multicenter study.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Stewardship in Clinical Microbiology: An Indispensable Component of Patient Care.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Utility of Serial Microbial Cell-free DNA Sequencing for Inpatient and Outpatient Pathogen Surveillance Among Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- From Shadows to Spotlight: Enhancing Bacterial DNA Detection in Blood Samples through Cutting-Edge Molecular Pre-Amplification.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of machine learning based genome sequence analysis in pathogen identification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Refractory Bilateral Tubo-Ovarian Abscesses in a Patient with Iatrogenic Hypogammaglobulinemia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Insight Into Neonatal Sepsis: An Overview.Cureus · 2023Review
- Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023Article
- The Role of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Biofilms on Late-Onset Sepsis: Current Challenges and Emerging Diagnostics and Therapies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Rapid and precise identification of bloodstream infections using a pre-treatment protocol combined with high-throughput multiplex genetic detection system.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Technologies for rapid microbial identification are poised to revolutionize clinical microbiology and enable informed decision making for patients with life-threatening bloodstream infections. Species identification of microorganisms in positive blood cultures can be performed in minutes using commercial fluorescence in situ hybridization tests or mass spectroscopy. Microorganisms in positive blood cultures can also be identified within 1-2.5 hours using automated polymerase chain reaction-based systems that can also detect selected antibiotic resistance markers, such as methicillin resistance. When combined with antibiotic stewardship programs, these approaches improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare expenditures. Tests for direct detection in whole blood samples are highly desirable because of their potential to identify bloodstream pathogens without waiting 1-2 days for blood cultures to become positive. However, results for pathogen detection in whole blood do not overlap with those of conventional blood culture techniques and we are still learning how best to use these approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.