ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2014
Intracranial ganglioglioma WHO I: results in a series of eight patients treated with stereotactic interstitial brachytherapy.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond surgical resection: evaluating stereotactic brachytherapy iodine-125 for low-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this retrospective study we evaluated the efficacy of interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) using (125)Iodine seeds ((125)I) for intracranial ganglioglioma WHO I. Between October 1994 and March 2010, eight patients (m/f = 5/3, median age 30.4 years, age range 7-42.5 years) with intracranial ganglioglioma WHO I were treated with IBT using stereotactically implanted (125)I seeds. The median follow-up time was 41.5 months (range 16.7-140.1 months). Prior to interstitial brachytherapy one patient underwent microsurgical resection for three times; seven patients were treated with IBT primarily. In all patients we implanted the (125)I seeds stereotactically guided. The cumulative tumor surface dose ranged between 50 and 65 Gy (permanent implantation) and the median tumor volume was 5.6 ml (range 0.9-26 ml). After brachytherapy, follow-up MR imaging revealed complete remission in one patient, partial remission in three and stable disease in the remaining four patients. Five of eight patients presented with seizures were either seizure-free (1/5) or improved (4/5). Temporary treatment-related morbidity occurred in one patient only (headache, nausea/vomiting) and resolved completely under steroid medication after 4 weeks. No treatment-related mortality was observed. This study indicates that interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of intracranial ganglioglioma WHO I is safe and provides a high rate of local tumor control. Due to the limited number of cases, it is not possible to conduct a rigorous statistical evaluation. Thus, larger numbers of patients are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.