Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24771087›Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2014

Old cell, new trick? Cnidocytes as a model for the evolution of novelty.

Leslie S Babonis, Mark Q Martindale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decoding cnidarian cell type gene regulation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Looking Down on NF-κB.Molecular and cellular biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EvoDevo · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leslie S BabonisWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 N Oceanshore Blvd, St. Augustine, FL 32080, USA babonis@whitney.ufl.edu.
Mark Q MartindaleWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 N Oceanshore Blvd, St. Augustine, FL 32080, USA.

Funding

Gene regulatory network evolution and the origin of biological noveltiesR01GM093116 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI MARTINDALE, MARK Q · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how new cell types arise is critical for understanding the evolution of organismal complexity. Questions of this nature, however, can be difficult to answer due to the challenge associated with defining the identity of a truly novel cell. Cnidarians (anemones, jellies, and their allies) provide a unique opportunity to investigate the molecular regulation and development of cell-novelty because they possess a cell that is unique to the cnidarian lineage and that also has a very well-characterized phenotype: the cnidocyte (stinging cell). Because cnidocytes are thought to differentiate from the cell lineage that also gives rise to neurons, cnidocytes can be expected to express many of the same genes expressed in their neural "sister" cells. Conversely, only cnidocytes posses a cnidocyst (the explosive organelle that gives cnidocytes their sting); therefore, those genes or gene-regulatory relationships required for the development of the cnidocyst can be expected to be expressed uniquely (or in unique combination) in cnidocytes. This system provides an important opportunity to: (1) construct the gene-regulatory network (GRN) underlying the differentiation of cnidocytes, (2) assess the relative contributions of both conserved and derived genes in the cnidocyte GRN, and (3) test hypotheses about the role of novel regulatory relationships in the generation of novel cell types. In this review, we summarize common challenges to studying the evolution of novelty, introduce the utility of cnidocyte differentiation in the model cnidarian, Nematostella vectensis, as a means of overcoming these challenges, and describe an experimental approach that leverages comparative tissue-specific transcriptomics to generate hypotheses about the GRNs underlying the acquisition of the cnidocyte identity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsCell DifferentiationCnidariaGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory Networks

Identifiers

PMID24771087
PMCPMC4817572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.