Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24771030›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Molecular method for detection of total coliforms in drinking water samples.

Andrée F Maheux, Dominique K Boudreau, Marc-Antoine Bisson, Vanessa Dion-Dupont, Sébastien Bouchard, Martine Nkuranga, Michel G Bergeron, Manuel J Rodriguez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recent developments in waterborne pathogen detection technologies.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrée F MaheuxChaire de recherche en eau potable de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada École supérieure d'aménagement du territoire et de développement régional, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada andree.maheux.3@ulaval.ca.
Dominique K BoudreauCentre de recherche en infectiologie de l'Université Laval, Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Marc-Antoine BissonChaire de recherche en eau potable de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche en aménagement et développement de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Vanessa Dion-DupontChaire de recherche en eau potable de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche en aménagement et développement de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Sébastien BouchardChaire de recherche en eau potable de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche en aménagement et développement de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Martine NkurangaChaire de recherche en eau potable de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche en aménagement et développement de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Michel G BergeronCentre de recherche en infectiologie de l'Université Laval, Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada Département de microbiologie-infectiologie et d'immunologie, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Manuel J RodriguezChaire de recherche en eau potable de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada École supérieure d'aménagement du territoire et de développement régional, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work demonstrates the ability of a bacterial concentration and recovery procedure combined with three different PCR assays targeting the lacZ, wecG, and 16S rRNA genes, respectively, to detect the presence of total coliforms in 100-ml samples of potable water (presence/absence test). PCR assays were first compared to the culture-based Colilert and MI agar methods to determine their ability to detect 147 coliform strains representing 76 species of Enterobacteriaceae encountered in fecal and environmental settings. Results showed that 86 (58.5%) and 109 (74.1%) strains yielded a positive signal with Colilert and MI agar methods, respectively, whereas the lacZ, wecG, and 16S rRNA PCR assays detected 133 (90.5%), 111 (75.5%), and 146 (99.3%) of the 147 total coliform strains tested. These assays were then assessed by testing 122 well water samples collected in the Québec City region of Canada. Results showed that 97 (79.5%) of the samples tested by culture-based methods and 95 (77.9%), 82 (67.2%), and 98 (80.3%) of samples tested using PCR-based methods contained total coliforms, respectively. Consequently, despite the high genetic variability of the total coliform group, this study demonstrated that it is possible to use molecular assays to detect total coliforms in potable water: the 16S rRNA molecular assay was shown to be as efficient as recommended culture-based methods. This assay might be used in combination with an Escherichia coli molecular assay to assess drinking water quality.

Indexed as

CanadaColony Count, MicrobialDNA, BacterialDrinking WaterEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliFecesPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater MicrobiologyDNA, BacterialDrinking WaterRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24771030
PMCPMC4068683
OpenAlexW2136220169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.