Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24771028›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Bacterial targets as potential indicators of diesel fuel toxicity in subantarctic soils.

Josie van Dorst, Steven D Siciliano, Tristrom Winsley, Ian Snape, Belinda C Ferrari

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diesel in Antarctica and a Bibliometric Study on Its Indigenous Microorganisms as Remediation Agent.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The ecological roles of microbial lipopeptides: Where are we going?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  12. Bioremediation byMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Josie van DorstSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Steven D SicilianoDepartment of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Tristrom WinsleySchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Terrestrial and Nearshore Ecosystems Program, Australian Government Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
Ian SnapeTerrestrial and Nearshore Ecosystems Program, Australian Government Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
Belinda C FerrariSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia b.ferrari@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUAustralian Antarctic Division · AUAustralian Government · AUUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate remediation targets or universal guidelines for polar regions do not currently exist, and a comprehensive understanding of the effects of diesel fuel on the natural microbial populations in polar and subpolar soils is lacking. Our aim was to investigate the response of the bacterial community to diesel fuel and to evaluate if these responses have the potential to be used as indicators of soil toxicity thresholds. We set up short- and long-exposure tests across a soil organic carbon gradient. Utilizing broad and targeted community indices, as well as functional genes involved in the nitrogen cycle, we investigated the bacterial community structure and its potential functioning in response to special Antarctic blend (SAB) diesel fuel. We found the primary effect of diesel fuel toxicity was a reduction in species richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity, with the resulting community heavily dominated by a few species, principally Pseudomonas. The decline in richness and phylogenetic diversity was linked to disruption of the nitrogen cycle, with species and functional genes involved in nitrification significantly reduced. Of the 11 targets we evaluated, we found the bacterial amoA gene indicative of potential ammonium oxidation, the most suitable indicator of toxicity. Dose-response modeling for this target generated an average effective concentration responsible for 20% change (EC20) of 155 mg kg(-1), which is consistent with previous Macquarie Island ecotoxicology assays. Unlike traditional single-species tolerance testing, bacterial targets allowed us to simultaneously evaluate more than 1,700 species from 39 phyla, inclusive of rare, sensitive, and functionally relevant portions of the community.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAntarctic RegionsBacteriaBiotaEnvironmental PollutionGasolineGenetic VariationOxidoreductasesPhylogenySoil Pollutantsammonia monooxygenaseGasolineOxidoreductasesSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID24771028
PMCPMC4054227
OpenAlexW2111602356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.