Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24770975›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2014

Validating the content of a brief informational intervention to empower patients and spouses facing breast cancer: perspectives of both couple members.

Marie-Claude Blais, Elizabeth Maunsell, Sophie Grenier, Sophie Lauzier, Michel Dorval, Sylvie Pelletier, Stéphane Guay, André Robidoux, Louise Provencher

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie-Claude BlaisDépartement de psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Elizabeth Maunsell
Sophie Grenier
Sophie Lauzier
Michel Dorval
Sylvie Pelletier
Stéphane Guay
André Robidoux
Louise Provencher

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 017527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study objectives were to identify key information components that would be the basic content of a brief informational intervention, developed from a population perspective, to empower individual couple members facing breast cancer and to validate the relevance and acceptability of these components.

methodsA review of information relevant to couples facing cancer presented in internet sites and documents of national cancer organizations was made to identify information components to include in a brief informational intervention. These information components were framed as messages, that is, very brief sentences or tips. To validate the relevance and acceptability of these messages, six focus groups were conducted in Quebec City and Montreal among women who had had breast cancer and their spouses. Reactions to the messages were synthesized by analyzing the verbatim transcripts.

resultsA total of 70 individuals (35 women with an average of 14 months since diagnosis and 35 spouses) participated in the groups. The content of almost all messages was seen as relevant, although nuances and improvements were discussed. However, the message format provoked irritation and will need improvement.

conclusionsFindings provide validation of the relevance, from the viewpoint of women and their spouses, of the message content to be part of a brief informational intervention intended to empower couples as they cope with breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Couples approved of the idea of being guided in their adjustment to breast cancer. However, the message format requires adaptation and further testing.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationSpousesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual Behavior

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.