Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24770793›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2014

The phosphoinositide PI(3,5)P₂ mediates activation of mammalian but not plant TPC proteins: functional expression of endolysosomal channels in yeast and plant cells.

Anna Boccaccio, Joachim Scholz-Starke, Shin Hamamoto, Nina Larisch, Margherita Festa, Paul Vijay Kanth Gutla, Alex Costa, Petra Dietrich, Nobuyuki Uozumi, Armando Carpaneto

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TPC Functions in the Immune System.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Evolutionary Aspects of TRPMLs and TPCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna BoccaccioInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Via De Marini 6, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
Joachim Scholz-Starke
Shin Hamamoto
Nina Larisch
Margherita Festa
Paul Vijay Kanth Gutla
Alex Costa
Petra Dietrich
Nobuyuki Uozumi
Armando Carpaneto
National Research Council · ITFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DENational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · USTohoku University · JPUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-pore channel proteins (TPC) encode intracellular ion channels in both animals and plants. In mammalian cells, the two isoforms (TPC1 and TPC2) localize to the endo-lysosomal compartment, whereas the plant TPC1 protein is targeted to the membrane surrounding the large lytic vacuole. Although it is well established that plant TPC1 channels activate in a voltage- and calcium-dependent manner in vitro, there is still debate on their activation under physiological conditions. Likewise, the mode of animal TPC activation is heavily disputed between two camps favoring as activator either nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) or the phosphoinositide PI(3,5)P₂. Here, we investigated TPC current responses to either of these second messengers by whole-vacuole patch-clamp experiments on isolated vacuoles of Arabidopsis thaliana. After expression in mesophyll protoplasts from Arabidopsis tpc1 knock-out plants, we detected the Arabidopsis TPC1-EGFP and human TPC2-EGFP fusion proteins at the membrane of the large central vacuole. Bath (cytosolic) application of either NAADP or PI(3,5)P₂ did not affect the voltage- and calcium-dependent characteristics of AtTPC1-EGFP. By contrast, PI(3,5)P₂ elicited large sodium currents in hTPC2-EGFP-containing vacuoles, while NAADP had no such effect. Analogous results were obtained when PI(3,5)P₂ was applied to hTPC2 expressed in baker's yeast giant vacuoles. Our results underscore the fundamental differences in the mode of current activation and ion selectivity between animal and plant TPC proteins and corroborate the PI(3,5)P₂-mediated activation and Na(+) selectivity of mammalian TPC2.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBiological TransportCalciumCalcium ChannelsCytosolEndosomesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLigandsLysosomesNeomycinPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhosphatidylinositol PhosphatesProtein IsoformsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArabidopsis ProteinsCalciumCalcium ChannelsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLigandsNeomycinphosphatidylinositol 3,5-diphosphatePhosphatidylinositol PhosphatesProtein IsoformsTPC1 protein, ArabidopsisTPCN2 protein, humanTwo-Pore ChannelsVerapamilZinc

Identifiers

PMID24770793
PMCPMC11113638
OpenAlexW2011577446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.