Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24770492›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision2013

Stacked Predictive Sparse Coding for Classification of Distinct Regions of Tumor Histopathology.

Hang Chang, Yin Zhou, Paul Spellman, Bahram Parvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unsupervised Transfer Learning via Multi-Scale Convolutional Sparse Coding for Biomedical Applications.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hang ChangLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
Yin ZhouLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
Paul SpellmanCenter for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Bahram ParvinLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.

Funding

TCGA Data Analysis Center at BerkeleyU24CA143799 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI SPEED, TERENCE PAUL, SPELLMAN, PAUL T. · 2009 to 2016
$4.9M
High Content Representation and Association of 3D Cell Culture ModelsR01CA140663 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI PARVIN, BAHRAM A. · 2011 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140663NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-based classification of tissue histology, in terms of distinct histopathology (e.g., tumor or necrosis regions), provides a series of indices for tumor composition. Furthermore, aggregation of these indices from each whole slide image (WSI) in a large cohort can provide predictive models of clinical outcome. However, the performance of the existing techniques is hindered as a result of large technical variations (e.g., fixation, staining) and biological heterogeneities (e.g., cell type, cell state) that are always present in a large cohort. We suggest that, compared with human engineered features widely adopted in existing systems, unsupervised feature learning is more tolerant to batch effect (e.g., technical variations associated with sample preparation) and pertinent features can be learned without user intervention. This leads to a novel approach for classification of tissue histology based on unsupervised feature learning and spatial pyramid matching (SPM), which utilize sparse tissue morphometric signatures at various locations and scales. This approach has been evaluated on two distinct datasets consisting of different tumor types collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and the experimental results indicate that the proposed approach is (i) extensible to different tumor types; (ii) robust in the presence of wide technical variations and biological heterogeneities; and (iii) scalable with varying training sample sizes.

Identifiers

PMID24770492
PMCPMC3998824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.