Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24769220›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2014

A functional neuroimaging review of obesity, appetitive hormones and ingestive behavior.

Kyle S Burger, Laura A Berner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Applying psycho-behavioural phenotyping in obesity characterization.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Homeostasis and food craving in obesity: a functional MRI study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle S BurgerDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC, United States. Electronic address: kyle_burger@unc.edu.
Laura A BernerDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Drexel University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Self-regulatory Control and Eating: A Neuroimaging Study of Bulimia NervosaF31MH097406 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BERNER, LAURA A. · 2012 to 2013
$65k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH097406NIMH NIH HHS F31MH097406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate energy intake is vital for the survival of humans and is regulated by complex homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms. Supported by functional MRI (fMRI) studies that consistently demonstrate differences in brain response as a function of weight status during exposure to appetizing food stimuli, it has been posited that hedonically driven food intake contributes to weight gain and obesity maintenance. These food reward theories of obesity are reliant on the notion that the aberrant brain response to food stimuli relates directly to ingestive behavior, specifically, excess food intake. Importantly, functioning of homeostatic neuroendocrine regulators of food intake, such as leptin and ghrelin, are impacted by weight status. Thus, data from studies that evaluate the effect on weight status on brain response to food may be a result of differences in neuroendocrine functioning and/or behavior. In the present review, we examine the influence of weight and weight change, exogenous administration of appetitive hormones, and ingestive behavior on BOLD response to food stimuli.

Indexed as

ObesityAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBrainFeeding BehaviorHumansNeuroimagingAppetitive hormonesFood intakeFunctional MRIIngestive behaviorObesityReward

Identifiers

PMID24769220
PMCPMC4519076
OpenAlexW2075048575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.