Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24769028›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2014

GSTP1 promoter methylation is associated with recurrence in early stage prostate cancer.

Leonel Maldonado, Mariana Brait, Myriam Loyo, Lauren Sullenberger, Kevin Wang, Sarah B Peskoe, Eli Rosenbaum, Roslyn Howard, Antoun Toubaji, Roula Albadine and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differential DNA Methylation in the Benign and Cancerous Prostate Tissue of African American and European American Men.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonel MaldonadoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mariana BraitDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Myriam LoyoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lauren SullenbergerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kevin WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sarah B PeskoeDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Eli RosenbaumDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Roslyn HowardDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Antoun ToubajiDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Roula AlbadineDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
George J NettoJames Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mohammad O HoqueDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth A PlatzJames Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
David SidranskyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: dsidrans@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
TRANSGENIC MODELS FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND AUTOIMMUNITYP50CA058236 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DENMEADE, SAMUEL R · 1992 to 2020
$43.9M
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL MOLECULAR MARKERSU01CA084986 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 1999 to 2014
$33.8M
TUMOR SUPPRESOR GENE PROMOTER HYPERMETHYLATION FOR DETECTION OF HEAD AND NECKP50DE019032 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 2007 to 2016
$27.1M
Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058236NCI NIH HHS P50CA58236NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337NCI NIH HHS U01 CA084986NCI NIH HHS U01-CA84986NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE019032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecurrent prostate cancer remains a major problem. Staging, grading and prostate specific antigen level at surgery are helpful but still imperfect predictors of recurrence. For this reason there is an imperative need for additional biomarkers that add to the prediction of currently used prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe evaluated the extent of promoter methylation of genes previously reported as aberrantly methylated in prostate cancer (AIM1, APC, CCND2, GPX3, GSTP1, MCAM, RARβ2, SSBP2 and TIMP3) by quantitative fluorogenic methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. We used cancer tissue from a nested case-control study of 452 patients surgically treated for prostate cancer. Recurrence cases and controls were compared and the association between methylation extent and recurrence risk was estimated by logistic regression adjusting for patient age at prostatectomy, prostatectomy year, stage, grade, surgical margins and preprostatectomy prostate specific antigen. All statistical tests were 2-sided with p ≤0.05 considered statistically significant.

resultsThe extent of GSTP1 methylation was higher in patients with recurrence than in controls (p = 0.01), especially patients with early disease, ie organ confined or limited extraprostatic extension (p = 0.001). After multivariate adjustment GSTP1 promoter methylation at or above the median was associated with an increased risk of recurrence, including in men with early disease (each p = 0.05).

conclusionsGreater GSTP1 promoter methylation in cancer tissue was independently associated with the risk of recurrence in patients with early prostate cancer. This suggests that GSTP1 promoter methylation may be a potential tissue based recurrence marker.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPromoter Regions, GeneticDNA, NeoplasmFollow-Up StudiesGlutathione S-Transferase piHumansIncidenceMaleMarylandMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesDNA, NeoplasmGlutathione S-Transferase pibiological markersglutathione S-transferase pilocalmethylationneoplasm recurrenceprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24769028
PMCPMC4390043
OpenAlexW2091235560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.