Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24768866›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2014

Sanctions as honest signals--the evolution of pool punishment by public sanctioning institutions.

Sarah Schoenmakers, Christian Hilbe, Bernd Blasius, Arne Traulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Can institutions foster cooperation by wealth redistribution?Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  3. Emergence of specialized third-party enforcement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The competitive advantage of institutional reward.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah SchoenmakersUniversity of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Straße 9-11, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Christian HilbeProgram for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, One Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department for Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemannstraße 2, 24306 Plön, Germany. Electronic address: hilbe@fas.harvard.edu.
Bernd BlasiusUniversity of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Straße 9-11, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Arne TraulsenDepartment for Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemannstraße 2, 24306 Plön, Germany.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many species, mutual cooperation is stabilized by forms of policing and peer punishment: if cheaters are punished, there is a strong selective pressure to cooperate. Most human societies have complemented, and sometimes even replaced, such peer punishment mechanisms with pool punishment, where punishment is outsourced to central institutions such as the police. Even before free-riding occurs, such institutions require investments, which could serve as costly signals. Here, we show with a game theoretical model that this signaling effect in turn can be crucial for the evolution of punishment institutions: In the absence of such signals, pool punishment is only stable with second-order punishment and can only evolve when individuals have the freedom not to take part in any interaction. With such signals, individuals can opportunistically adjust their behavior, which promotes the evolution of stable pool punishment even in situations where no one can stand aside. Thus, the human propensity to react opportunistically to credible punishment threats is often sufficient to establish stable punishment institutions and to maintain high levels of cooperation.

Indexed as

Games, ExperimentalModels, TheoreticalPunishmentSocial BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleEvolution of cooperationInstitution formationPublic goods gameTragedy of the commons

Identifiers

PMID24768866
PMCPMC4099534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.